Search for: "State v. Cooke" Results 2781 - 2800 of 3,562
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2024, 6:21 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 17 December 2024, judgment was handed down by Mr Justice Picken in R (On the Application Of Serious Fraud Office) v Cook & Anor [2024] EWCR 8. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In a recent example of the perils of misjudged social media use Thameslink has issued an apology to Poundland after comparing its own poor service to that of Poundland cooking chocolate. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiff alleges that on August 2, 2013, Defendant again became intoxicated, physically forced Plaintiff to leave their joint hotel room and stated that he wanted "20 men to rape" her. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:59 am by Steve Hall
Arizona and the 2004 Supreme Court ruling in Schriro v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:31 pm by Steven Calabresi
Washington, D.C. super-lawyer, Gene Schaerr, has filed an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:30 am
  The case is called Williams v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 11:10 am
” This “opens up rather opportunistic and destructive battles on the validity of priority claims,” also referring to the Accord v RCT judgment of Mr Justice Birss. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) What every transactional counsel should know – consequences of missing provisions in M&A documents: Carotek v Kobayashi Ventures; Gerber Scientific International v Satisloh (Property intangible) Troll Tracker suit settles after malice bar raised: Albritton v Cisco(Patent Baristas) (IPEG)(EDTexweblog.com) (The Prior Art) (IAM)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC construes term found in specification but not in the claims:… [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm by Duncan
(Public Knowledge) Michael Geist presentation: ACTA – The state of play (Michael Geist) Australia I thought cats were colour blind… Federal Court confirms Mars has exclusive right to use colour ‘Whiskas purple’ for cat food: Mars Australia Pty Ltd (formerly Effem Foods Pty Ltd) v Société des Produits Nestlé SA (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) FCAFC: On appeal, simulated flames from direct light found infringing: Bitech… [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 6:34 am by Russell Knight
In Cook Cook County, Illinois, judges require Petitioners to fill out an affidavit stating that the Respondent is not in the military and explain why they believe that to be true. [read post]