Search for: "State v. Holder" Results 2781 - 2800 of 8,247
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Not necessarily.Rumors have been circulating that the new EO will apply the same criteria as EO 13769 but expressly exempt green card holders, student visa holders, and other people with substantial contacts with the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 2:45 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2017-02-11 https://t.co/7lED1yoHpU -> Copyright subsists in standards AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 5:04 pm by mdkeenan
Holder, the court stated that a simple DUI has never been considered a crime of moral turpitude, but an aggravated DUI could be such a crime. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 5:04 pm by mdkeenan
Holder, the court stated that a simple DUI has never been considered a crime of moral turpitude, but an aggravated DUI could be such a crime. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 9:26 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The Court in Fourco relied heavily on its 1942 decision, Stonite Products Co. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 1:09 am by Jani Ihalainen
This decision will delight many rights holders in Member STates with punitive damage provisions, and pushes the law a little in their favour going forward. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 1:44 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
For instance, the burden onPapst is mitigated by Papst’s status as a non-practicingpatent holder residing outside the United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm by Josh Blackman
Holder, under the old regime, an LPR “could travel abroad for brief periods without jeopardizing his resident alien status. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 6:38 pm by JP Sarmiento
Since our client resided in Cleveland, Ohio, her application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 3:00 am by Barry Sookman
https://t.co/8dpkkIEPkB -> The Supreme Court Tackles Disparaging Trademarks https://t.co/Z0Ma8wL7yi -> US court refuses to enforce an "In the box" agreement in Samsung case https://t.co/aZLvj8pZhX -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2017-02-08 https://t.co/AOo6tZRLjo -> Blaclock's cost Notice of Appeal https://t.co/6lewkQ2HtR quotes from my casecomment blog post https://t.co/8ELSIC2lf4, H/T @howardknopf -> Link to US 9th Circuit decision refusing to stay travel ban… [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 4:59 am by SHG
Separating out the green card holders, legal permanent residents, who were absurdly included at first, then ineptly excepted after, the concern for due process rights under the United States Constitution came from non-United States Citizens who were either on foreign soil or, per the odd technicalities of United States border law, had not entered the United States. [read post]