Search for: "State v. Pounds" Results 2781 - 2800 of 3,059
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2011, 5:07 am
One such instance occurred recently when a cartoonist tried to sue the BBC for millions by claiming that CBeebies bosses copied his characters: Michael Mitchell v BBC [2011] EWPCC 42. [read post]
3 May 2016, 4:12 am by SHG
This goes to the same trade-off reflected by the U.S. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 6:03 am
Drukteinis (M.D. and J.D.) discussed the legal issues presented when a consultant refuses the request of the ER doc, at NY Emergency Medicine;Tort "reform" took center state at a Republican presidential debate. [read post]
15 Jun 2004, 11:47 am
" Swift J, Cleghorn v Oldham [1927] 43 TLR 465Some would say that sport is a reflection of life itself. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Legal Beagle
  In Bartos v Scottish Legal Complaints Commission 2015 SC 690, at its own instance the court raised a question as to the proper approach to certain provisions in the Legal Profession and Legal Aid (Scotland) Act 2007 (the Act). [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 8:07 pm by Stephen Bilkis
At the same time that the defendant was driving the wrong way in the southbound lanes of the Meadowbrook State Parkway, a limousine was proceeding south in the left southbound lane of the Meadowbrook State Parkway. [read post]
One wonders whether this line of PI decisions, which ultimately maintained an injunction on an invalid patent for over an month with an estimated value of tens of millions of pounds to Bayer, bolsters the pro-patentee approach developed in Novartis v Hospira in 2013. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:32 am by SHG
People v Tims, 449 Mich 83, 95, 99, 103-104; 534 NW2d 675 (1995). [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 9:36 am by Bexis
  We have subscribers from the FDA and other governmental entities, both federal and state. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 5:10 am by INFORRM
Conclusion In Slim v Daily Telegraph Ltd Lord Diplock referred to “the artificial and archaic character of the tort of libel” ([1968] 2 QB 157, 171). [read post]