Search for: "State v. Public Service Commission"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 4,897
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2018, 10:49 pm
The reasoning in cases such as Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Sport Leisure Pty Ltd (2012) 202 FCR 286 and Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Lonsdale Australia Ltd (2012) 294 ALR 72 no longer apply and organisations will potentially need to reconsider their ownership arrangements in Australia. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 10:49 pm
The reasoning in cases such as Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Sport Leisure Pty Ltd (2012) 202 FCR 286 and Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Lonsdale Australia Ltd (2012) 294 ALR 72 no longer apply and organisations will potentially need to reconsider their ownership arrangements in Australia. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm
Colorado Civil Rights Commission). [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm
Colorado Civil Rights Commission). [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 1:18 pm
Both more stringent to benefit of users/public and to benefit of © owners in some important ways; many big services do these things already. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 10:46 am
He then notes that, based on public statements from many public officials, it is clear that if al-Nashiri is acquitted, there is no intention to release him. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 11:11 am
Labor Commission (Utah Ct. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 7:23 pm
Wood storks v. developers. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 9:39 am
According to a five-member majority of the California Supreme Court in Augustus v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 3:16 pm
(j) All courthouses, jails, public offices and buildings, lots, grounds and personal property, the fixtures, furniture, books, papers and appurtenances belonging and pertaining to the courthouse, jail and public offices belonging to any county of this State, all cemeteries, public squares, parks and places, public buildings, town halls, markets, buildings for the use of fire departments and military organizations, and the lots and grounds thereto… [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 3:16 pm
(j) All courthouses, jails, public offices and buildings, lots, grounds and personal property, the fixtures, furniture, books, papers and appurtenances belonging and pertaining to the courthouse, jail and public offices belonging to any county of this State, all cemeteries, public squares, parks and places, public buildings, town halls, markets, buildings for the use of fire departments and military organizations, and the lots and grounds thereto… [read post]
14 May 2023, 4:30 am
The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ RightWilliams v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
California – On Heels of Ridley-Thomas Indictment, LA County Hires Firm to Launch Sweeping Audit Los Angeles Daily News – Ryan Carter and City News Service | Published: 2/4/2022 Los Angeles County hired the law firm Covington & Burling to conduct the audit of its contracting policies and processes and review all its major service contracts. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 9:58 am
The majority appeared to have had little difficulty in finding open hostility among members of the state Civil Rights Commission to baker Phillips’ religious views. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 7:36 am
Box 1437, Slot S380 Little Rock, AR 72203-1437 Phone: (501) 682-2277 Web: http://www.medicaid.state.ar.us State CHIP Program (health care for low-income uninsured children) ARKids Division of Medical Services Arkansas Department of Human Services P.O. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
Public Service Commission, the government must prove that non-discriminatory measures would fail to satisfy the government's interests. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 8:49 am
Arce, 34 Fed.Appx. 879, n. 4 (4th Cir., 2002)(not selected for publication); Green v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 4:16 pm
The Law Commission has launched a consultation to explore how the law governing misconduct in a public office is being used and the problems caused by its lack of clarity. [read post]
8 May 2023, 8:16 am
Public Service Commission, courts have applied a four-part test in resolving First Amendment challenges to commercial speech regulations. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am
Perjured testimony would certainly encourage courts to permit juries to consider whether the witness payments were for the substance of testimony, rather than for disinterested professional services. [read post]
