Search for: "United States v. Fields"
Results 2781 - 2800
of 5,962
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2016, 2:00 pm
’State v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 4:00 am
[California v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 1:38 pm
” [7] United States v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 12:27 pm
Intelligent Biosystems [IBS} is the appellant in an appeal to the CAFC from the United States Patent and TrademarkOffice, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. [read post]
6 May 2016, 1:50 pm
Republicans now control the vast majority of elected offices in the states. [read post]
4 May 2016, 10:38 am
See State v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 10:38 am
See State v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 6:37 am
Discussing the long-held principles of preemption, the appeals court noted that preemption may be implied where the area of law is fully occupied by federal regulation (field preemption) or where a state law conflicts with federal law (meaning it is impossible to comply with both or the state law is an “obstacle” to fully executing the purpose of the federal law). [read post]
4 May 2016, 6:30 am
There are two threats to using securitization to solve one of the primary problems in the bio-pharmaceutical field--funding research and development of new pharmaceuticals in the United States. [read post]
4 May 2016, 5:25 am
Over the past months, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has had to open three different files in this regard, with one glorious EU country (Poland), and a couple of UK judges seeking clarification as to the lawfulness of the Directive under different standpoints [Cases C-358/14, Poland v Parliament and Council; C-477/14, Pillbox 38(UK) Limited v Secretary of State for Health; and C-547/14, Philip Morris Brands SARL and Others v Secretary of… [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm
[Is the United States scaleable? [read post]
2 May 2016, 11:26 am
In the United States, its products are sold under the brand name “TENA. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
For example Williams v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 12:10 pm
Intermediate v. strict scrutiny standard: but that’s one of the principal disputes right now. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 6:31 am
Rehnquist of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:33 am
Dodd, 598 F.3d 449, 452–53 (U.S.Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit 2010)); see also United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 5:08 pm
A New York Divorce Lawyer said the parents made a preanswer motion to dismiss the petition on the ground that Domestic Relations Law § 72 violates the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution based on the recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Troxel v Granville. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 12:51 pm
Before a new drug may legally be distributed in the United States, both its contents and its labeling must be preapproved by the FDA. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:59 am
As the Supreme Court explained in Baker v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:27 am
The North Carolina Court of Appeals decided a significant case yesterday, ruling in State v. [read post]
