Search for: "Vice v State" Results 2781 - 2800 of 4,799
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
It appeared as though their political involvement since the entry of Jerry Falwell’s Moral Majority in 1979 had led to one spectacular defeat after another—Roe v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
It appeared as though their political involvement since the entry of Jerry Falwell’s Moral Majority in 1979 had led to one spectacular defeat after another—Roe v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 5:48 am by INFORRM
The Court held that the Vice President of the Republic violated the principle of secularism on which the Colombian state is based. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 7:15 am
The Nevada Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide contains State resources compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 2:41 am by Peter Mahler
Vice Chancellor Glasscock’s ruling last week in Carr v Global Payments Inc. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 10:52 am by MBettman
Frost: (then-Clerk of the Court) On March 21, 2011, the appellee, the State of Ohio, filed a motion seeking my recusal from State v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 6:56 am by Eric Goldman
Backpage * District Court Ruling Highlights Congress’ Hastiness To Pass ‘Worst of Both Worlds FOSTA’– Doe 1 v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:48 am by Peter Mahler
” Examples featured on this blog include the decision by Justice Saliann Scarpulla (then a Manhattan Commercial Division judge, later elevated to the appellate bench) in Advanced 23, LLC v Chamber House Partners, LLC and retired Justice Charles Ramos’s decision in Goldstein v Pikus. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 12:40 pm
On appeal Miller argues that the state appellate court unreasonably concluded that McShane's performance at sentencing was not deficient or prejudicial, and he further contends that United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]