Search for: "Wells v. Justice Court" Results 2781 - 2800 of 29,087
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2025, 3:32 pm
Defendant is convicted, sentenced to 120 years to life, and appeals.It's not required (AFAIK) by the Rules of Court or by the California Style Manual, but were I the one writing this published opinion, I wouldn't mention -- as Justice Stratton's opinion does -- the full name of this particular (very frightened) witness. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:57 am by Beth Graham
  One of the cases the high court will consider this fall is BG Group PLC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:11 pm by Jason Mazzone
The article uses the twentieth anniversary of United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by David Cohen - Guest
  Again, no, it’s not, as a majority of the Justices rejected that claim as well. [read post]
24 May 2010, 3:33 pm
A while back, I wrote a post about a disparate impact case on the Supreme Court's docket, Lewis v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 9:49 am by Amy Howe
Chief Justice Roberts announces opinion in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 11:18 am by Evangelina Cantu
” The Dissent by Justice Jim Rice – the Standing Issue In his dissent, Justice Rice focused exclusively on the issue of standing, which is indeed the fundamental issue that has prevented others from successfully pursuing climate change [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 1:50 am by Florian Mueller
The way I would put it (and have put it on previous occasions) is that the Federal Court of Justice has vitiated Huawei v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 4:33 pm by Steven Calabresi
The Supreme Court did today for the Seventh Amendment roughly what it did for the Second Amendment in District of Columbia v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:51 am by Walter Olson
James Beck explains and Orac has some strong views as well (”I’m afraid Justice Sotomayor borders on the delusional when she blithely proclaims that courts are so good at efficiently disposing of meritless product liability claims. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 1:35 am by INFORRM
In The Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor v TLU & Anor [2018] EWCA Civ 2217 the Court of Appeal, was asked to review one aspect of Mr Justice Mitting’s decision in TLT & Ors v The Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2016] EWHC 2217 (QB). [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 10:50 am
The California Supreme Court should grant review in this one.Not because it's a critical issue. [read post]