Search for: "Billings v. United States"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 10,147
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2018, 10:03 am
Thus it presumably authorizes the same scope of activities, which the Supreme Court found to include law of war detention in Hamdi v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 12:00 pm
Oregon can never be one of the United States. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 12:13 pm
Before the United States began waiving its sovereign immunity, would-be claimants’ only recourse was to get Congress to pass a bill in their favor. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 12:13 pm
Before the United States began waiving its sovereign immunity, would-be claimants’ only recourse was to get Congress to pass a bill in their favor. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 12:13 pm
Before the United States began waiving its sovereign immunity, would-be claimants’ only recourse was to get Congress to pass a bill in their favor. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 5:16 am
United States of America v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 8:18 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s ban on same-sex marriage) and United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 4:23 pm
The Commission adopted Decision 2000/520 pursuant to that provision accepting that the ‘Safe Harbor’ system in the United States provided a satisfactory level of protection. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
In response to the PHE, Secretary Azar of the Department of Health and Human Services declared that DEA-registered practitioners in all areas of the United States may issue prescriptions for all schedule II-V controlled substances to patients for whom they have not conducted an in-person medical evaluation, provided all of the following conditions are met: The prescription is issued for a legitimate medical purpose by a practitioner acting in the usual course of his/her… [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 2:01 pm
Represent or supervise the representation of the United States Government in the Supreme Court of the United States and all other courts, foreign and domestic, in which the United States is a party or has an interest as may be deemed appropriate. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 1:17 pm
The government shouldn’t punish individuals for engaging in First Amendment activity, Trout argued, but the Identities Act does just that, by allowing conviction without a showing of the defense’s intention to harm the United States. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 1:06 pm
The California Supreme Court’s 2018 landmark decision, Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:00 am
The Fourth District suggested at some length that the “no set of circumstances test” was vague, difficult to apply, and that it wasn’t entirely clear that even the United States Supreme Court truly adhered to it anymore, citing Washington State Grange v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 2:19 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled in Casias v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:06 am
This is my second post on United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 8:46 am
Last week, we wrote about two dissenting opinions in a Supreme Court decision that highlight the debate that is underway on the principles that govern defamation liability in the United States. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 1:58 pm
Please...The Anti-Google Bill And An Apology from LG Preface: My apologies, but a loyal geeker just pointed out...United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 9:00 pm
blank">Bill of Rights (Image from the blank">public domain.) [read post]
