Search for: "Bills v. State"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 21,828
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
In Bellotti v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 6:06 am
A bill that would clarify the private status of state employee birthdates Another bill would answer the question raised by Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 7:46 pm
7Cir Affirms Former Deutsche Bank Traders Chanu and Vorley's Spoofing ConvictionsUnited States of America, Plaintiff/Appelle, v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:15 am
CALCUTT, III v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 4:51 am
., Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:58 pm
Earlier this month, the Ontario Divisional Court released its decision (by the Court) in Canadian Federation of Students v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 4:56 pm
Regan (Clean Water Act; Navigable Waters Protection Rule) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2021.html In the Matter of D.J. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 11:00 am
Yesterday, the Fifth Circuit issued its decision in Adar v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 3:13 am
The Supreme Court decided the case of New York State Pistol and Rifle Association v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:35 pm
Coop. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 12:25 pm
Supreme Court decision Roe v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 5:06 am
In the decision of Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 10:46 am
See also Sweet v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Estate of Shabazz and Goldman v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 3:52 pm
My hometown newspaper, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, was reporting over the weekend that supporters of the so-called marriage amendment to the Pennsylvania Constitution are attempting to revive the bill in the wake of the California Supreme Court's decision overturning that state's ban on same-sex marriage. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 1:24 pm
Related Cases: Alasaad v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 9:33 am
Specifically, in McIntyre v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 2:28 pm
Our last case law discussion comes to us from the Ohio Supreme Court in Embassy Healthcare v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 3:38 pm
Pressser, the Ninth Circuit said, only rejected one theory, or at most two theories, of “incorporating” part of the Bill of Rights to apply to the states, leaving open the third theory — one-by-one, or selective, incorporation of specific rights toward the states through the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause. [read post]
