Search for: "CHANCE v. STATE" Results 2801 - 2820 of 12,121
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Health Reform Erin Fuse Brown, Georgia State University College of Law, Could States Do Single-Payer? [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 1:05 pm by Patricia Hughes
It provides a shield for individuals from arbitrary state action. [read post]
”) Lord Kerr, like Stephens J at first instance, noted that that was not an immutable requirement as the ECtHR had stated in  Mocanu v Romania (10865/09) (2015) 60 EHRR 19 (Paras 107-108 of Lord Kerr’s judgment) and as the Supreme Court had found in McCaughey’s case (See paras 118, 119 and, in particular, 139 of McCaughey’s case). [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 7:07 am
The Federal Court refused en banc rehearing of the case, so SCOTUS is Google's last chance. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In R v Belnavis the Supreme Court stated that “the reasons for this principle of deference are apparent and compelling. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:22 am by familoo
And where it is the state gathering and using this material there is a pretty good chance that it isn't lawful at all (parents need not panic this applies to situations where social workers are looking at and gathering data about private individuals). [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 2:15 pm by Schachtman
The test allows us to evaluate whether two proportions are likely different by chance alone, by calculating the probability of the observed outcome, as well as more extreme outcomes. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:37 pm by Mark Walsh
Breyer also announced the judgment and delivered a plurality opinion yesterday in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]