Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 34,277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2012, 4:30 am
MacKinnon v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 5:15 am
In a precedential opinion, Intellisoft v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 9:19 pm
Last year, the California Supreme Court held in Howell v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 9:34 am
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 4th, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 12:15 pm
Help us out on it, California Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 1:51 pm
Naftel Ever since the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Reynolds v. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 12:10 pm
In doing so, the Court declined to extend California v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 11:21 am
It was championed by his father, John V. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 2:37 pm
In August, the Ninth Circuit asked the California Supreme Court to answer an employment law question in Peabody v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
California Late Fees and the Law What are the rules for late fees in California? [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:40 am
In closing, the dissent observes that it seems illusory to treat theft of stocks as a conversion but deny similar treatment to wages owed.I’m not 100% settled on where I come down on these competing arguments, but, for purposes of California law, the majority defines where things stand. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:27 am
The case, Silguero v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 3:46 pm
It's all common law. [read post]
23 May 2023, 8:30 am
Supreme Court’s 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 8:00 am
California Health and Welfare Agency (9th Cir. 1983) 704 F.2d 1465 (state and counties were employers under California's IHSS program) and distinguished Moreau v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 12:50 pm
The California Supreme Court held “that a county may be bound by an implied contract under California law if there is no legislative prohibition against such arrangements, such as a statute or ordinance. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 2:45 pm
A federal court in the Northern District of California has squarely rejected the argument that awards of copyright statutory damages are subject to the constitutional limits on punitive damages set forth in BMW of North America, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 2:13 pm
Keller et al. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 11:55 am
California law states that you are dui if your blood alcohol is .08 or higher. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 4:05 am
Confirming once again that the shopping mall defines California's culture, the California Supreme Court in Fashion Valley Mall, LLC v. [read post]
