Search for: "DOES I-X" Results 2801 - 2820 of 7,397
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2017, 4:00 am by John Gillies
If you have adopted changes suggested by Lawyer X, acknowledge that fact in the next update. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 9:13 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
App'x 879, 881 (5th Cir. 2010).CA5 in Douglass has a lengthy discussion of "unobjected to" findings/conclusions which includes the text:As stated, Nettles offered no explanation for changing the appellate waiver rule announced in Lewis to a forfeiture rule applicable only to factual findings. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 12:06 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
**As one footnote to Oullette's comments [e.g., I haven't carefully checked your sources (just as I don't carefully check the sources of articles I blog about, since this is a blog, not a law review)], one should note that Oullette has a Ph.D. in physics from Cornell and authored a paper -- Probing electrostatic potentials in solution with carbon nanotube transistors, L Larrimore, S Nad, X Zhou, H Abruna, PL McEuen - Nano letters, 2006 -- so one… [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 11:01 am by Lanigan
Fee Structure Hourly Rate is Effective So we fall back into the fee structure which I have never liked but it seems to be the only one that effectively works and that is between now and that point in time when I can give you an effective answer I’m going to charge you X dollars per hour. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 9:30 pm by Jonathan Baron
(In a separate essay, I assess the effect of the discount rate.) [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 1:18 pm by Jane Chong
Section I: Purpose and Scope  Importantly, the procedures start off with a description of what remains unaffected. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In a case between Apple and Samsung, say, Justice X is invested in both parties. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 10:24 am by Quinta Jurecic
” The story does not, of course, begin with Jones, and it doesn’t end with him either. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 6:40 am by Jonathan Bailey
That brings us to… Copyright and Plagiarism in 2017 Usually this is where I saw something like “Year X is in the books but it gives us a look at what is ahead in X+1. [read post]
1 Jan 2017, 8:58 pm by David Cheifetz
I suspect it does, but doesn’t that depend on what the SCC meant by “conclusions on fact and responsibility”? [read post]