Search for: "Defendant Doe 2" Results 2801 - 2820 of 40,590
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2024, 8:42 am by Andrew Delaney
The dissent does not agree that the sole reason for delay is defendant’s incompetency and reasons that the state had an obligation to bring the case to trial and to reevaluate defendant’s competency at some point in the last, you know, twenty years. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:06 pm
But unbeknownst to Defendant, due to a childhood trauma, Victim is intensely fearful of anyone wearing a red fez hat, which Defendant happens to have on, so Victim does not resist the pickpocket.What now? [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 9:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel 2: Creativity and Incentives to Create Keith Sawyer: Token nonlawyer. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 10:00 am
In a decision this week, the Eleventh Circuit reversed the decision of a district court, holding the "one-satisfaction rule" does apply to infringement claims under the Copyright Act.This appeal arose out of a jury award to copyright plaintiff of almost $1.6 million against two defendants who infringed the plaintiff's rights in its used boat price guide. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 am by INFORRM
It was not difficult for Binchy J to conclude that subsection 2(c) did indeed apply to the defendant ([52]), and he continued ([53]): On the face of it therefore the defendant has available to it a statutory defence to the proceedings issued against it. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:04 pm by HR Hero
The Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration and Immigration Rights and Fight for Equality by Any Means Necessary (BAMN), 572 U.S. ___ (2014). [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 12:29 pm by Patrick Hindert
The tax credit would cost the government, just as the current exclusion does. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 6:05 pm by Douglas Berman
The courts below decided, however, that these defendants were not eligible for sentence modifications under Section 3582(c)(2). [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:38 am
September 13, 2011): The Court holds that (1) stale information (one year old) that Defendant dealt drugs on a handful of occasions, combined with (2) an expert opinion that drug dealers typically keep drugs in their homes, is not enough to establish probable cause to search the Apartment. . . . [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 8:43 pm by Mathews P. George
The defendant no. 2, Key-Systems GmBH, was directed to cancel the registration of the impugned domain name in favor of the defendant. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 4:43 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
The trial judge awarded an additional $60,000 in costs in favour of the plaintiff by reason of the failure of the defendant’s insurer to comply with sections 258.5(5) and 258.6(2) of the Ontario Insurance Act. [read post]