Search for: "English v. English"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 9,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2010, 10:57 am
" This year we made one of those English puddings. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Lord Sumption, referring to Lord Hoffmann’s speech in Matadeen v Pointu [1999] 1 AC 98 and that of Baroness Hale in Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] 2 AC 557, stated that the principle of equality was “not a principle special to the jurisprudence of the European Union. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 3:00 am
(Halifax v HM Customs and Excise (C-255/02)) HMRC sought to recover VAT on the full sale price of the cars and charged penalties. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:42 am
In addressing the very nature of human rights law, Lord Reed called with approval upon the words of Lord Cooke in R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 2 AC 532: “The truth is, I think, that some rights are inherent and fundamental to democratic civilised society. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 12:36 am
In Coromin Ltd v AXA Re & Ors [2007] EWHC 2818 (Comm), the Commercial Court considered whether Coromin was entitled to be indemnified by its reinsurers for the physical damage and business interruption losses suffered by its insured as a result of a defective mill motor at a copper mining and processing facility in Chile. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 2:27 am
In The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs v Weald Leasing Ltd [2008] EWHC 30 (Ch), the High Court dismissed an appeal by the Commissioners against a ruling by a VAT and duties tribunal that a scheme deferring irrecoverable VAT using artificial leases was not contrary to the purpose of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 (or Directive 77/388 which the Act implemented) and therefore not abusive. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
For example, in Williams v Bayley 1 HL 200 a son forged his father’s signature to obtain promissory notes from a bank. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
Merpel has an English version of his interview by Juve, a German review for lawyers, translated into English. [read post]
17 Apr 2021, 8:17 am
This Kat is pondering green vs white asparagusAs this Kat sees Germany gearing up for Spargel (asparagus) season, an equally exciting harvest can be found around the IP blogs.CopyrightThe news which lit up the IP blogosphere last week was indisputably the US Supreme Court's ruling in Google v Oracle, which determined that the incorporation of program code into the Android operating system was fair use by Google. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 8:43 am
McDermott and Jenkins v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:30 pm
The New Haven Roots of Roe v. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 6:51 am
The case is Cortes v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 11:31 am
The case Schroades v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 12:33 pm
Carlill prevailed at both trial and appeal, and the rest is contract law history.Carbolic Smoke Ball advertisement, circa 1892.Outside of contract law casebooks, where can you read the full text of Carlill v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 8:49 pm
Ltd v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:16 am
In adopting this new defense, Canada followed the lead of the then-House of Lords in England, which had transformed English defamation law in 2006 and 1999 decisions by embracing the "responsible journalism" defense.Ever since New York Times v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 7:18 am
Freedman for drawing our attention to this paywalled story in the National Law Journal by Jimmy Hoover, on the publication of ‘The History of Double Jeopardy and Criminal Jurisdiction: US v Gamble (2019) and R v Hutchinson (1677)," Law Quarterly Review 139 (2023): 390-411, by Peter Alldridge, Queen Mary University of London, and Ann Mumford, Kings College London. [read post]
22 Nov 2024, 9:30 pm
” Law Book Exchange's November 2024 catalogue of Scholarly Law & Legal History is here.ICYMI: An essay on Gong Lum v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 10:14 am
by Dennis Crouch ABS Global, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 2:18 am
In the case of Kajima UK Engineering Limited v The Underwriter Insurance Company Limited [2008] EWHC 83 (TCC), the Technology and Construction division of the High Court considered the ambit of a notification provision in a "claims made" policy. [read post]
