Search for: "In re D. W."
Results 2801 - 2820
of 4,486
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2011, 3:05 am
My Law Office is located at 726 West Saint Georges [W. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:02 am
” Richard W. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am
Cir. 2011) (en banc): The dissenting opinion (Patent Docs) CAFC finds re-examined claims of U.S. [read post]
23 May 2022, 4:05 am
They’re trading on random fluctuations; according to the EMH, what they’re doing is little better than gambling. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 5:09 pm
Lanza (D. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
PLMIC, LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) Applicant’s policing efforts lead to TTAB reversal of mere descriptiveness refusal of PERFECTING SERUM for skin moisturizer: In re Murad, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB finds HEALTH HOME VACUUM not merely descriptive for vacuum cleaners: Oreck Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
PLMIC, LLC (not precedential) (TTABlog) Applicant’s policing efforts lead to TTAB reversal of mere descriptiveness refusal of PERFECTING SERUM for skin moisturizer: In re Murad, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB finds HEALTH HOME VACUUM not merely descriptive for vacuum cleaners: Oreck Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:50 pm
W. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 10:19 am
Either that or they're all: What's with the null set and the small bore/large bore? [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
B-Roc Reps., Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) TTAB dismisses 2(d) opposition, finding BELL HILL for wine and BELL’S for beer too dissimilar: Bell's Brewery, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:55 pm
I can come up with additional excuses if you’d like. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:06 am
They’re not here to hurt me. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
Green, D. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 8:36 am
The Arnstein panel was Frank; Learned Hand (who’d crafted the © infringement test up to then); and Charles Clark. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(IP Watchdog) PLI publishes 2009 Federal Circuit Yearbook (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Inequitable conduct defense requires that specific facts regarding circumstances and intent to deceive must be included in pleadings: Exergen Corp v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) CAFC: McNeil dodges bullet on timing of appeal filing: In re McNeil (Patent Baristas) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog)… [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 7:10 am
Ignatius Grande 7:01 You know, so I do think I told one of the organizers that they they lucked out, because if you’d had this event two or three weeks ago, even nobody would not. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
Putting aside the idiosyncratic chapter by the late Professor Berger, most of the third edition of the Reference Manual presented guidance on many important issues. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 6:45 am
Eine solche Vorbildwirkung wäre nur vorhanden, wenn die Grundlagen dieser Zulassung öffentlich zugänglich wären und unabhängig überprüft werden könnten. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
” From May 21, 2018, through December 24, 2018, you did not perform re-sampling on (redacted) days and did not document written corrective actions for any of the swabbed areas after out-of-specification Listeria spp. results were received. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:00 am
Ely, Jr., The Chief Justiceship of Melville W. [read post]
