Search for: "In re Page"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 38,182
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2013, 8:22 am
Page 874 does contain the textThe effect of "consisting essentially of" was considered in In re Janakirama-Rao, 50 CCPA 1312, 317 F.2d 951, 137 USPQ 893, where, as in the present case, the claims were directed to a glass composition and the reference contained some modifying components in addition to those claimed by appellant. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 9:29 am
If you’re looking for probate records, you may be asking: Can I find probate records online for free? [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 6:39 am
As previously discussed in these pages, Sullivan & Cromwell isn't taking Aaron Charney's lawsuit lying down. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 10:02 am
We’re in this together with you. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 8:52 am
From the Web page: We're looking for creative and thoughtful people of all ages for a chance to win cold, hard cash! [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:55 pm
From the retreat Web page: Sep 8 - Sep 11 5 California MCLE credits will be available for this retreat in the areas of ethics and elimination of bias. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 5:43 am
" And if you've never seen "The Curious Incident of the Dog At Night" (and most of you haven't) you're missing Broadway at its most ingenious and finest. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 1:10 pm
State and Federal Communications is marking 22 extraordinary years of serving our clients! [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 10:18 am
On Friday, February 5, the staff of State and Federal Communication supported Go Red for Women! [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 9:53 am
State and Federal Communications is at NCSL 2015, August 4-6 in Seattle! [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 8:46 am
State and Federal Communications has a team of 10 leaving tomorrow to attend the Council on Governmental Ethics Laws (COGEL) 36th Annual Conference! [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 2:03 pm
State and Federal Communications is marking 23 extraordinary years of serving our clients! [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 9:04 am
[It is unconstitutional, the 11th Circuit holds, for Florida to deny voting rights to ex-felons solely because they have outstanding fines or fees. to vote And yes, "re-disenfranchise" is a real word.] [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 5:01 pm
Things may get rough with the move we’re trying. [read post]
14 Sep 2006, 5:23 am
So, using "to pretext" as meaning to lie (or, minimally, to falsely pretend), George and company pretexted about WMDs, pretexted about the use of rendition and torture, pretexted about the real reasons for using military tribunals (the "real reason was that they knew civilian courts would not let in evidence obtained by torture), pretexted about the competence of the government's response to Katrina (remember "You're doing a heck of a job Brownie?) [read post]
16 May 2008, 11:29 am
While I disagree with him on a few technicalities, we’re on the same page for most of what he preaches. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 9:00 am
So, say you're looking in The Little Book of Baseball Law. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 4:39 am
Feb 21, 2013 Please refer to Question # 12 of the July 11, 2005, procedure memorandum located in the “downloads” section of this page for detailed information regarding when a re-evaluation request maybe submitted. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 2:01 pm
They’re free, quick to set up and come with a built-in audience to build from, namely one’s existing friends. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 11:38 am
Zotero can tell when you’re viewing a book or an article or, now, a legal judgment, but until recently it had no category, if you like, for blog entry. [read post]
