Search for: "Long v. Williams" Results 2801 - 2820 of 4,238
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2014, 2:12 am
This Kat thinks that under US law the response should be pretty straightforward, in the sense of 'No' being likely answer, as any potentially infringing activities might be considered fair use within §107 of the Copyright Act, particularly because of their transformative nature [as recent examples, see Cariou v Prince, here, and Seltzer v Green Day, here]. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
13 May 2015, 8:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 So too with the presence of the ingredients on the ingredient list (citing the Ninth Circuit’s Williams v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 7:09 am by Florian Mueller
That he has gotten away with this for such a long time is all the more astounding considering that his boss, Attorney General William Barr, once testified against Qualcomm and its business practices.As I just said, each of those many pro-FTC submissions serves a purpose. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 10:12 am by Stephen Wermiel
Justices have long engaged in the practice described by the late Justice William J. [read post]
18 May 2017, 7:15 am by Stephen Wermiel
So settled was this custom that when Justice William Brennan issued his first decision on December 3, 1956, an 8-1 ruling in a tax case (Putnam v. [read post]