Search for: "Miller, in the Matter of" Results 2801 - 2820 of 5,112
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2014, 12:14 pm by Jack Goldsmith
  Or, putting the point another way, if repealing the AUMF by itself ends the Forever War, then the war will end in a way that matters only to law professors. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
We don’t discuss damages much, except to fulminate about punitive damages. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 1:33 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  In the First District’s view of the matter:  “Petitioners seek to stand the market participation doctrine on its head and use it to avoid the preemptive effect of a federal statute the state entity is seeking to invoke…. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
Since 1663, the Royal Society has sported the motto:  “Nullius in verba,” on no one’s authority. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 12:57 pm by Ray Dowd
Dowd Find Ray Dowd at Dunnington Bartholow & Miller LLP Copyright Litigation Handbook (West 6th Ed. 2012) by Raymond J. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 5:46 am by Jack Goldsmith
Perhaps DeYoung and Miller can go back to their sources and fill in this history. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 8:49 pm by Kevin O'Keefe
The discussion kicked off when I read a post in my RSS feeds from Rocket Matter’s Tim Baran (@tim_baran). [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 7:41 am by Steve Lovelady
“Obscenity”, of course, is a term of art defined by the Supreme Court (in the 1973 Miller decision). [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 6:52 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
There are, however, a few conditions of his bail: he’s had to surrender his passport and he can’t leave the states of New York and New Jersey (sorry, Jen Miller) without permission. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 11:29 am by Keith L. Miller
No charges have been filed and the matter remains under investigation by the Dedham Police Department and the Massachusetts State Police. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:42 am by Venkat Balasubramani
For that matter, do websites have a duty to warn about all manner of possible dangers that users may be exposed to when communicating with others via a website? [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 2:55 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a published decision filed September 15, 2014, the First District Court of Appeal reversed and remanded a trial court’s post-judgment order granting an unsuccessful CEQA petitioner’s motion to tax the entire $64,144 cost bill of respondent City. [read post]