Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 4,554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2011, 9:07 am
For example, in Ches v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 9:34 am
State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
They each provided precise dates when the employment would end. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
They each provided precise dates when the employment would end. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 2:22 pm
This double-standard became patently obvious in the wake of recent protests. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
He suggested that it is unfair to hold the Plaintiffs to a precise pleading standard, and demand "specific allegations in the complaint to defeat a claim of mootness that the plaintiffs had no reason whatsoever to anticipate until after we granted certiorari and the city decided to try to moot this case. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 2:40 pm
The full text of the decision in Frank v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:49 am
Eggleston v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 10:44 am
What I'm interested in (because I believe many readers will be curious, too) is what indication the "rebate" gives us with a view to Qualcomm's standard-essential patent (SEP) royalty demands. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:06 pm
But what that definition is, precisely, has repeatedly split lower federal courts. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 8:50 am
The trial court, in Ruff v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 12:53 pm
More recently, a majority of justices applied this standard in Crawford v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 1:50 pm
Quoting the Supreme Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:23 pm
” No court, he argued, had ever upheld Congress’ use of its subpoena power to obtain the personal papers of a sitting president. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:16 pm
The Supreme Court endorsed such a test in a case called Boumediene v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 9:23 am
" In Regan v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:13 am
B. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 3:02 am
Moreover, that is precisely the remedy plaintiffs were seeking -- to require the government to seek and obtain orders from the FISA court finding probable cause that FISA's standards are met before engaging in any electronic surveillance. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:44 am
When deadly force is used, such as in this case, the deadly force standard is applied. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 6:08 pm
He cites precisely nothing to support that thesis. [read post]
