Search for: "People v Johns" Results 2801 - 2820 of 8,216
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by Illinois BLJ
  Not even people outside of the business sector would be safe from the Act. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
At Oxford, he also studied under John Hicks (famous for his contribution to welfare economics, including the formulation of what is now called “Kaldor-Hicks efficiency”). [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm by Mark Walsh
The court takes the bench and Chief Justice John Roberts pauses to let everyone settle in their seats before announcing that the opinion in Flowers v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
We have had 10 years of total control of the air in Laos and V. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:10 am
For the record, when it comes to fair use, John's in favour. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 8:13 am
 Miri, who like many readers is an IP enthusiast but not a patent specialist, reflects the concerns of many people who find themselves floating in that strange position of being somewhere between a layman and an expert. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 3:18 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
My prior posts on the Koch-v-Cato kerfuffle are here and here. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:18 am by Cory Doctorow
Below, we have set out examples of how DMCA 1201 -- and its Mexican equivalent -- is incompatible with human rights, including free expression, self-determination, the rights of people with disabilities, cybersecurity, education, and archiving; as well as the law's consequences for Mexico's national resiliency and economic competitiveness and food- and health-security. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:08 pm by Mark Walsh
Once everyone is settled into their seats, Chief Justice John G. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 10:45 am
In legal briefs, attorneys for Adultland and owner Eric V. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 6:42 am by Erin Miller
  The Caucus Blog of the New York Times adds two more Republicans — John Thune and John Cornyn – to the list of Senators who have announced that they will vote against Kagan. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 7:22 pm by Smita Ghosh
Urofsky’s Dissent and the Supreme Court: Its Role in the Court’s History and the Nation’s Constitutional Dialogue (review by John C. [read post]