Search for: "State v. Good Bear"
Results 2801 - 2820
of 5,194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
Many people have good reason to choose stun guns as self-defense tools. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 1:00 am
Neither side disputed that these articles represented CGK.The standard reference work, a piece of good, old-fashioned, CGKII. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:42 pm
In Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Vitole, Matter of Phelan, it was held that the court bears the ultimate responsibility for approving legal fees that are charged to an estate and has the discretion to determine what constitutes reasonable compensation for legal services rendered in the course of the administration of an estate. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 10:45 pm
In Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Vitole, Matter of Phelan, it was held that the court bears the ultimate responsibility for approving legal fees that are charged to an estate and has the discretion to determine what constitutes reasonable compensation for legal services rendered in the course of the administration of an estate. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 10:52 pm
In Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Vitole, Matter of Phelan, it was held that the court bears the ultimate responsibility for approving legal fees that are charged to an estate and has the discretion to determine what constitutes reasonable compensation for legal services rendered in the course of the administration of an estate. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 12:49 am
See paragraph 13(a) of my decision in RJ v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2012] AACR 28. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 10:46 pm
In her affidavit of services the guardian ad litem stated that she spent 7.2 hours on the matter, representing a charge of $2,828.00 for services rendered. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
30 Aug 2014, 10:42 pm
In Matter of Stortecky v Mazzone and Matter of Vitole, Matter of Phelan, it was held that the court bears the ultimate responsibility for approving legal fees that are charged to an estate and has the discretion to determine what constitutes reasonable compensation for legal services rendered in the course of the administration of an estate. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:14 am
The majority concluded that, under Feiner v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 9:41 am
State, 681 S.E.2d 320 (N.C. 2009) (holding that a nonviolent felon whose crime was long in the past regained his state constitutional right to keep and bear arms); Baysden v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:17 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 11:25 am
From Silvester v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
Pritchard v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:05 am
– The California Supreme Court, People v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 2:12 am
In the matter of Commonwealth v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 2:44 pm
That is why the district court was correct and the Sixth Circuit is wrong in Payne v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:14 pm
That process of identification can then be brought to bear on the “uniqueness” issue. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 4:30 am
So far so good. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 7:56 am
See, Sytsema by Sytsema v. [read post]
