Search for: "State v. Read" Results 2801 - 2820 of 65,609
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2011, 7:31 am by Lauren Gilbert - Guest
District Judge Bolton enjoined enforcement of various provisions, a decision later upheld by the Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 8:02 am by Peter Hunt
  The United States Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals (the last stop before the US Supreme Court) refused to follow a case out of the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals named Barbetta v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 12:49 pm by Dan Tokaji
United States, as in other recent cases, the Court’s interest in avoiding… Continue reading The post Daniel Richman on Percoco appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 4:56 pm
For those too lazy to read the two Gonzalez opinions by NMCCA, that's me, here is a redline version showing the changes from the August 10 opinion, United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 12:55 pm by Danielle Citron
  Federal district court Judge Chen’s recent dismissal of the third amended complaint in Levitt v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Anil Kalhan
Reading Hanen’s lengthy, often strident opinions on the deferred action initiatives has long had a Groundhog’s Day quality, since in many respects the core substantive issues in the litigation have not changed very much over the years. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 3:18 am by Matt Danzer
Judge Newman further challenges Jaffer, reiterating his contention that a Vaughn index is too vague to be useful and stating that this case is primarily about the OLC-DOD memo. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 12:58 pm by Jason Rantanen
The Supreme Court recently observed this challenge to patent claim interpretation, stating in Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 1:18 am by Editor
State court certified copies of computer printouts of entries reflecting the defendant’s prior criminal convictions was presumptively reliable under FRE 803(8); the mere possibility of error in the computer records was insufficient to challenge their reliability, in United States v. [read post]