Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 2801 - 2820 of 14,190
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2023, 9:47 pm by Richard Frank
  In 2011, a unanimous Supreme Court held in American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:30 am by Matthew Flinn
In this way, any interference was of his own making (this argument had been deployed and accepted in McFeeley v United Kingdom (1980) 3 EHRR 161). [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:22 pm by WIMS
Oct 3: National Mining Association (NMA) President and CEO Hal Quinn announced that the association was filing a petition in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for reconsideration and stay and petition for review of U.S. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 12:51 pm by Rich McHugh
The United States Supreme Court today issued an opinion in King v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 10:04 am by Tom Kosakowski
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California has unveiled an Ombudsperson Program for attorneys to raise issues about the Court or individual judges. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 6:51 am by Nabiha Syed
United States and Hill v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 3:05 am
If the case goes past next week, which seems likely if the members return the unanimous finding of guilty to premeditated murder that would be necessary for the sentencing case to be capital, then court-martial proceedings will break for the week of 8 December because that week the military judge in the case, Army Colonel Stephen Henley, will be presiding over the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:36 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-6083 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 2012 U.S. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 8:00 am by Tim Sitzmann
With the explosion of craft beers in the United States, we can now do the same with our ales and lagers too. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 6:14 am by NCC Staff
Current President Donald Trump is now part of the case, called Smith v. [read post]