Search for: "California State Bar Court" Results 2821 - 2840 of 11,179
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Finance Georgia: “Abrams Campaign Seeks Dismissal of Request for Additional Documents in Ethics Probe” by Stephen Fowler for Georgia Public Broadcasting New Mexico: “Regulators Late on Campaign Finance Checks” by Morgan Lee (Associated Press) for Albuquerque Journal Elections Pennsylvania: “A Pennsylvania County’s Election Day Nightmare Underscores Voting Machine Concerns” by Nick Corasaniti (New York Times) for MSN Ethics National: “Ilhan… [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 5:15 am by SHG
Is it just one person, one monumentally stupid person, or is this the view of the California Bar Association? [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
While none of those cases deal with an Indian nation, Defendants would have this Court apply them by way of analogy: namely, an Indian nation is like the State of Louisiana, the Southampton Fire District, or a Zimbabwe-owned airline and, so, it too should be barred. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 12:57 am by Ben
This case has been lodged in the US District Court for the Central District of California, as reported by the World IP review. [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 12:30 pm by John Ross
California Supreme Court: Which violates the state constitution's guarantee that primaries include all recognized candidates on the ballot of a political party that qualified to participate in the primary. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 1:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Notably, CannTrust has also been hit with a securities lawsuit in Ontario (about which refer here) and a separate state court lawsuit in Santa Clara County, California. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 12:48 pm by Tom Zagorsky
Highly notable in the Kokesh decision was a footnote, wherein the Court stated that “nothing in this opinion should be interpreted as an opinion on whether courts possess authority to order disgorgement in SEC enforcement proceedings or on whether courts have properly applied disgorgement principles in this context. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm by Amy Howe
Moreover, the challengers add, state law contains an exception that allows the city to bar nonresidents from bringing a gun into the city. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 7:18 am by aschwartz
District Court for the Northern District of California with Apple joining as a plaintiff. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:25 am by Melanie Fontes
A similar bill was approved by an Assembly committee in California earlier this year. [read post]
23 Nov 2019, 6:00 am by Lauren Moxley
California, in which the Supreme Court held that the Fourth Amendment generally requires the government to obtain a warrant to search cell phones incident to arrest, to bar suspicionless or random searches of electronic devices at the border. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 1:31 pm by Rebecca Salamacha
The Supreme Court of California ruled Thursday against a California law that required presidential primary candidates to register tax returns with the state for primary candidacy. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 7:00 am by Andrew Hamm
California 19-532Issue: Whether provisions of California law that, with certain limited exceptions, prohibit state law-enforcement officials from providing federal immigration authorities with release dates and other information about individuals subject to federal immigration enforcement, and restrict the transfer of aliens in state custody to federal immigration custody, are preempted by federal law or barred by intergovernmental immunity. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
The District Court for the Southern District of California blocked the asylum ban—also called the “third-country asylum bar”—for immigrants in Mexico issued by the Justice Department. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 3:24 pm by Jason Kearnaghan and Elyssa Sternberg*
However, lower California courts recently decided other issues surrounding background checks, such as the amount of time employees have to file a claim. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 1:00 pm by Alan S. Kaplinsky
  In the preamble to the rulemaking agenda, the Bureau states that it is testing consumer disclosures related to time-barred debt disclosures and, after testing, will assess whether to issue a supplemental proposal seeking comments on a proposal concerning such disclosures. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:35 am by Eric B. Meyer
However, your mileage may vary, especially if you operate in one of those cuckoo states like California. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 2:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In recent years, a number of other states have enacted legislation protecting biometric data privacy, including Arkansas, California, and New York. [read post]