Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 48,918
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2018, 7:21 am
" Limelight Networks, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 4:39 am
In Gee v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 9:00 am
See Fip Realty Co. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 6:14 am
In Sierra Pacific Power Company v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 9:00 am
Shell U.S.A., Inc. et al. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 5:52 pm
On 13 January 2020, the CAFC denied a petition for en banc review in Biodelivery v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 12:00 am
v=nFlxuS39Fy0 [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 8:08 am
In McGinty v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 2:38 pm
Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 5:23 am
Revenue and Customs Commissioners v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:03 am
[Thomas Stebbins, Poughkeepsie Journal; Daily News] Tags: joint and several liability, New York, taxpayers, third party liability for crime Related posts Update: San Diego poisoning (1) Trespassers and skylights, UK edition (1) Rolando Montez’s fatal phone call: JCW Electronics, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 2:26 pm
While the court retains jurisdiction to intervene, ordinarily it will not do so unless the costs have been unreasonably incurred or are an unreasonable amount:Gomba Holdings Ltd v Minories Finance [1993] Ch 171 . [read post]
23 May 2007, 1:41 pm
In Porter Development, LLC v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:01 am
; Churchland v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 2:51 pm
In Holden v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 7:41 pm
The Eleventh Circuit ruled earlier this week in Morrissey v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:17 am
High Court (Chancery Division)Phoenix Property Investors Ltd v Grange Securities Ltd [2011] EWHC 1131 (Ch) (05 May 2011)Kingspan Group Plc & Anor v Rockwool Ltd (on costs) [2011] EWHC 1065 (Ch) (14 April 2011) High Court (Family Division)L (A Child: Media Reporting), Re [2011] EWHC B8 (Fam) (18 April 2011) High Court (Commercial Court)DSG International Sourcing Ltd & Anor v Universal Media Corporation (Slovakia) SRO [2011] EWHC 1116 (Comm) (05 May 2011)… [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 8:00 am
In Chavarria v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 2:09 pm
In Graves v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 3:00 am
Solicitors Regulation Authority v Davis and another [2011] WLR (D) 36 “Where a solicitor admitted disciplinary charges, and therefore anticipated sanctions upon him, he should give notice in advance of the hearing to the Solicitors Regulation Authority and the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal that he intended to contend either that no order for costs should be made against him, in exercise of the tribunal’s power under section 47(2) of the Solicitors Act 1974, or that… [read post]
