Search for: "DAVIE v. STATE"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 5,707
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Dec 2019, 7:12 am
It is styled, Curtis Davis v. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 12:44 pm
. * Dealing with Children as Witnesses* New Developments in the Right to Confront Witnesses: Davis v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 2:16 pm
Joe Mysak at Bloomberg has this article about the potential impact of Davis v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 12:37 pm
Breyer also announced the judgment and delivered a plurality opinion yesterday in Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm
The opinion suggests that the state all but conceded that this was the proper outcome of the case under Carey v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 10:48 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:00 am
Such a claim could be viable under Title VII and Section 1981 if properly pleaded and proven, the court explained, denying the employer’s motion to dismiss with leave to refile (Davis v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 4:09 am
Yesterday's Opinion by Justice Souter for the United States Supreme Court in the case of Lopez v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 1:42 pm
” United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 3:16 pm
” United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 8:18 am
Davis v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
GUNDY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 3:38 am
David Davis MP, Tom Watson MP and Others v the Secretary of State for the Home Department Today, the High Court found against the Government in David Davis’s and Tom Watson’s joint legal challenge to the Government’s emergency surveillance legislation. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:07 pm
In the case of Aitken v DPP ([2015] EWHC 1079 (Admin)) the Divisional Court dismissed a former editor’s appeal against a conviction for publishing a story which breached an anonymity order under section 39 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
In the 2011 case of Davis v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 3:40 pm
Quaker Oats Co., 232 F.3d 1271 (9th Cir. 2000), Nidds v. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 3:09 am
Dist., 28 NY3d 455, 465 [2016]; Davis v Isaacson, Robustelli, Fox, Fine, Greco & Fogelgaren, 284 AD2d 104, 105 [2001]). [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 3:40 pm
Quaker Oats Co., 232 F.3d 1271 (9th Cir. 2000), Nidds v. [read post]
