Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 7,397
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
X. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 2:32 pm
And we also first heard in June about the re-hearing of a fact finding hearing in relation to a now adopted child, with a view to the parents attempting subsequently to challenge the adoption orders (Re X (A Child)). [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 12:00 am
The admissibility of the appealIn view of the facts set out at points I, V and VI above, the board finds that the appeal satisfies the admissibility criteria under the EPC and is thus admissible.2. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 4:10 pm
For example, the regulations provide this example: (i) In year 1, W, a foreign corporation, forms and contributes assets to X, a domestic limited liability company that does not elect to be treated as a corporation under §301.7701-3(c) of this chapter. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 10:08 am
Mandibular Fracture It is not unusual for car accidents to cause facial fractures. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:45 am
[I agree with the majority that this slices the transaction too finely. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 3:46 pm
” However, he notes that “[i]t does not account for variable driving costs that change month to month (such as gas prices), nor does it consider the variations in costs from state to state for things like automobile insurance and fuel. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 10:01 am
With the twice-the-maximum rule in effect, the maximum is capped at 120 days (60 x 2). [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 10:01 am
With the twice-the-maximum rule in effect, the maximum is capped at 120 days (60 x 2). [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
But, if it does, I suggest you are wrong. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 2:16 pm
I believe the symbolic importance of this decision cannot be overstated. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
The patent does not draw a distinction between peripheral neuropathic pain and central neuropathic pain. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:31 pm
., 550 U.S.398, 418 (2007) (“[I]t can be important to identify a reasonthat would have prompted a [PHOSITA] to combine theelements in the way the claimed new invention does. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 1:28 am
But it does turn out that “tronc” is a dictionary word, meaning “(in a hotel or restaurant) a common fund into which tips and service charges are paid for distribution to the staff. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 8:17 am
My legal dictionary defines “waste” as “an act, by one in rightful possession of land who has less than a fee simple interest in the land, which decreases the value of the land or the owner’s interest,” and, for illustration purposes, think of a tenant-landlord situation where the tenant does something to decrease the value of the landlord’s property. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 1:59 pm
And a few people offering anecdotal evidence that “I’ve not done x” or “I’ve not seen x done”. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 5:35 am
If a law makes something illegal in situation X, but not in situation Y, is it always/sometimes/never necessary for the police to have probable cause to believe that X, and not Y, is the case? [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 3:00 am
Which brings me to the second argument. 2) I’ve been reading about the trouble with X and the results are going to hit the market pretty soon. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 2:11 pm
It is also worth pointing out that Rule 504 – unlike Rule 506 – does not preempt state blue sky laws. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:42 pm
Decubitus Ulcers I’m Ed Smith, a Sacramento nursing home negligence attorney. [read post]
