Search for: "Daily v. Daily"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 14,519
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2015, 9:10 am
<> Arizona v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 3:36 pm
CAAF's daily docket on Friday contains a denial of petition for grant of review in United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 7:41 am
eWinWin v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 10:09 pm
Reiter: Warner v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 3:52 am
Regina (Modaresi) v Secretary of State for Health and others [2011] EWCA Civ 1359; [2011] WLR (D) 340 “The 14-day period allowed to a detained mental patient to lodge an application with the Mental Health Review Tribunal as provided by section 66 of the Mental Health Act 1983 and rule 32(1) the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Health, Education and Social Care Chamber) Rules 2008 was not to be considered to have expired where, though sent by fax on the last working day within… [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 4:02 am
The requirement was not met even where the financial dependency which qualified such a relative for entry was the factor which prevented his or her circumstances from being such exceptional circumstances.” WLR Daily, 20th March 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 2:47 am
Fenland District Council v Sheppard and others [2011] EWHC 2829 (Ch); [2011] WLR (D) 316 “In making a vesting order, pursuant to section 320 of the Insolvency Act 1986, in favour of a statutory chargee whose charge ranked in priority to the mortgagees’ charge over the property, the court was not bound to set aside the mortgagees’ charge where the mortgagees did not themselves apply for a vesting order. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:29 am
Regina (Elam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 29; [2012] WLR (D) 14 “The licence expiry date applicable to a prisoner serving consecutive terms of imprisonment including at least one term of 12 months or more was to be determined by the provisions of section 264(3) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 unless all the offences for which the sentences were imposed had been committed before section 264 came into force on 4 April 2005; in such a case, section 37(1) of the… [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:12 am
Lovat v Hertsmere Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 1185; [2011] WLR (D) 306 “In the definition of ‘an excluded tenancy’ for the purposes of the additional right to enfranchisement applicable to tenancies not at a low rent under section 1AA of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967, the phrase ‘the house which the tenant occupies under the tenancy’ in section 1AA(3)(a) was to be construed as referring solely to the ‘house’ as defined in section 2(1) of the… [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 3:29 am
Failure to consider the exercise of that discretionary power, if it affected the fairness of the decision, was a procedural deficiency requiring the local authority to give the applicant notice of its intended decision and allow him to make further representations either orally or in writing.” WLR Daily, 1st November 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:01 am
Alstom Transport v Eurostar International Ltd [2012] EWHC 28 (Ch); [2012] WLR (D) 4 “Regulation 3(2) of the Utilities Contracts Regulations 2006 (‘UCR’) should be construed as if it said that network ‘includes a system operated in accordance’ instead of ‘means a system operated in accordance’. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 9:02 am
EPA - American Farm Bureau v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 8:58 am
EPA - American Farm Bureau v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 10:57 am
A13A0830, and Butler v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 10:57 am
A13A0830, and Butler v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 1:00 pm
In Alvarado v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 8:33 am
Read the opinion The post DAVID BOYD, ET UX. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:26 am
Mail story reads uncannily like one in the New York Times Does anyone remember INS v. [read post]
