Search for: "Daily v. Daily" Results 2821 - 2840 of 17,081
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2020, 12:00 am by D Daniel Sokol
Stephan Waldheim Bird asks Huawei v ZTE Five Years After—Luxembourg Locuta Causa Finita? [read post]
22 May 2012, 2:47 am by sally
Burnip v Birmingham City Council and another (Equality and Human Rights Commission intervening); Trengove v Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council and another (Same intervening); Gorry v Wiltshire County Council and another (Same intervening) [2012] EWCA Civ 629; [2012] WLR (D) 150 “The statutory criteria for calculating housing benefit for tenants in the private rented sector based on an entitlement to a one bedroom rate discriminated against the severely disabled and… [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 11:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
From the BlogsNYMUNIBLOGhas posted a new item, “Impacts of Federal Laws on Municipalities’ Daily Operations” by Joseph V. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 11:32 am
The Kaiser Daily Women's Health Policy Report reported this week on Senator John McCain's assertion that Roe v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 3:59 pm
Paul Mollica at Daily Developments in EEO Law has this excellent post on White v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:45 am
"The vanishing constitutional issue in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 2:46 am by sally
Assange v Swedish Prosecution Authority [2011] EWHC 2849 (Admin); [2011] WLR (D) 315 “In the context of the Extradition Act 2003, through interpretation of article 6 of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between member states (‘the Framework Decision’) and recognising differences of terminology used among member states, a ‘judicial authority’ was not confined to a judge who… [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 3:59 am by sally
Fortune and others v Wiltshire Council and another [2012] EWCA Civ 334; [2012] WLR (D) 90 “Section 67(2)(b) of the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act 2006, which provided that section 67(1), as to the ending of certain existing unrecorded public rights of way, did not apply where such a right of way was shown in a list of highways maintainable at public expense, as required to be kept by councils under section 36(6) of the Highways Act 1980, did not require that list to be… [read post]