Search for: "Does 1 - 29"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 13,847
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2023, 8:13 am
Reply comments will be due by November 29. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:38 am
Vice (Granted )Docket: 10-114Issue(s): 1) Whether defendants can be awarded attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:13 pm
Restating the last element, does the basis for the discrimination demand that this degree of differential treatment be imposed? [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 10:51 am
” This appeal by New Falls follows.At the outset, we note that Georgia law requires executors to file inventories of a decedent's property and annual returns.1 Nevertheless, a testator may, by will, dispense with these requirements, “provided the same does not work any injury to creditors or persons other than beneficiaries under the will. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 1:49 am
But Rogers faces these barriers: 1. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:46 am
There were differences — judges here threw out 1 in 21 cases, while the rate in Toledo was 1 in 27, and in Pittsburgh in in 45. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 2:18 am
3) Should Article 5 of the [InfoSoc] Directive (Directive 2001/29/EC) be interpreted as meaning that there is no “lawful use” within the meaning of Article 5(1)(b) of that Directive if a temporary reproduction is made by an end user during the streaming of a copyright-protected work from a third-party website where that copyright-protected work is offered without the authorisation of the right holder(s)? [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 3:46 am
3) Should Article 5 of the [InfoSoc] Directive (Directive 2001/29/EC) be interpreted as meaning that there is no “lawful use” within the meaning of Article 5(1)(b) of that Directive if a temporary reproduction is made by an end user during the streaming of a copyright-protected work from a third-party website where that copyright-protected work is offered without the authorisation of the right holder(s)? [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 6:03 am
Does the brief gloss to July 2010 news amount to putting lipstick on a pig? [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:49 am
CIRCUIT COURTS, # ARTICLE 29. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 11:08 am
Here’s a run-down of all the 2010 podcast installments available: January 29 – Welcome to The Proactive Employer February 5 – Are You Compensating Your Employees ‘Fairly’? [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 9:47 am
In support of his claim, the plaintiff argued: (1) the day rate system did not calculate pay “on a weekly, or less frequent basis” in violation of 29 C.F.R. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am
" Doc. 1-1, Texas Home Equity Note Ex. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 10:23 pm
An “investment fund manager” is deinfed under section 1(1) of the Act as a person or company that directs the business, operations or affairs of an investment fund. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 6:07 pm
Time constraints won't allow me today to cover the decision in detail, but here are a few key parts that deserve closer treatment when time allows: 1. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 4:05 am
., July 29, 2024), the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals in a 2-1 decision rejected free speech challenges to a school district's anti-bullying and anti-harassment policies that prohibit students from using pronouns that are inconsistent with another student’s gender identity if the use amounts to harassment. [read post]
18 May 2023, 9:00 pm
Roosevelt University, 2023 IL 128338 (Mar. 23, 2023), the Supreme Court of Illinois has ruled that the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act, 740 ILCS 14/1 (Privacy Act) protections do not apply to union-represented workers because claims under the Privacy Act may require interpretation of their collective bargaining agreement with their employer and are preempted by Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 2:01 am
A recent state inspection of the Berwyn nursing home resulted in 29 violations relating to resident safety and care. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:44 pm
Your income does not matter for the monthly subsidy. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 4:07 pm
On 29 January 2016, Nicol J handed down judgment in the case of Stocker v Stocker [2016] EWHC 147 (QB). [read post]
