Search for: "Downs v State" Results 2821 - 2840 of 40,832
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2010, 8:18 am by Douglas Reiser
The BIAW believes it will be successful in a challenge of the new law, due largely in part to the opinion handed down in the AHRI v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 6:38 pm
The United States Supreme Court bypassed an opportunity to revisit its much publicized 2005 Kelo v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 11:01 am by MBettman
On April 22, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 9:56 am by Jason Shinn
By way of example, the Court cherry-picked the case of Coates v Bastian Bros, Inc, (2007). [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:57 pm by Ilya Somin
Vullo, which addressed similar indirect coercion by New York state officials. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:06 am by INFORRM
Judgment was handed down today by Mr Justice Bean in the libel case of Cooke and Anor v MGN ([2014] EWHC 2831 (QB)). [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 2:22 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
They stated that the Court had no hesitation in concluding that it should do so in the present case. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 10:52 am by Orin Kerr
The en banc court handed down its opinions today, with Judge Sutton writing the majority opinion disagreeing with the panel decision. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 12:54 am by CMS
In this post, Joanna Clark and Emma Ainsley of CMS discuss the judgment handed down by the UK Supreme Court on 15 July 2020 in a referral from the High Court of Justiciary, the Scottish criminal appeal court, in the matter of Sutherland v Her Majesty’s Advocate [2020] UKSC 32 concerning the admissibility of evidence obtained by so-called “paedophile hunter” groups in criminal trials. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 12:11 pm
Mary, Star of the Sea elementary school, down here in San Diego County. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:25 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
Of more interest to me, and the reason I write today, is that, while everyone else is focused on the impact on patent trolls of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:04 am
On its arrival in Denmark, the parcel was inspected by the customs authorities: they suspended customs clearance, suspecting that it was counterfeit and that it infringed copyright, and told both Rolex and Blomqvist accordingly.In keeping with the procedure laid down by Customs Regulation 1383/2003, Rolex sought the continued suspension of customs clearance, established that the watch was in fact counterfeit and then asked Blomqvist to consent to its destruction. [read post]