Search for: "In Interest of IV" Results 2821 - 2840 of 6,748
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2020, 5:27 pm by DeFrancisco & Falgiatano
Facts of the Case Allegedly, in 2005 the plaintiff’s decedent, who had Stage IV lung cancer, was admitted to the defendant hospital after she fell out of her wheelchair and struck her head. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 2:15 am by gmlevine
The theory underlying this precedent is that a right or legitimate interest created by contract “clearly cannot last forever,” International E-Z UP, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 11:00 am
Any interested person, or authorized representative, may submit written comments to DLSE relevant to the proposed regulatory action. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 8:09 am
This requires: (i) a court order allowing the referendum, (ii) that the court order state the question that will appear on the ballot, (iii) the election must be held within a reasonable period of time after the request, and (iv) that the court has to set the election date. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:31 am by Dan Filler
Whatever one might think of this new proposal, and that goes to fundamental questions about what a law school should be teaching, the two common critiques - that it is too expensive and that it is designed to benefit a particular interest group (clinical faculty) - are off target. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:00 am by Stephanie Figueroa
As the publication notes, “Micromet is useful to practitioners as a primer for the application of fiduciary duty of disclosure claims to the specifics of financial analyses, and as a reminder of the importance of disclosure with respect to significant conflicting interests of transaction participants. [read post]
4 May 2012, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
  I find this aspect interesting because Article IV, Section 13 of the California constitution provides: A member of the Legislature may not, during the term for which the member is elected, hold any office or employment under the State other than an elective office. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 5:00 am by Gene Takagi
Reg. 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(3)(iv) advocating for a “doctrine” or “theory” per Rev Rul 62-71? [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:32 pm by Jason Shinn
But an employer cannot make such defamatory statements to employees who have no supervisory role and no duty that should interest them in the subject matter of the misconduct. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 9:27 am by Ezra Rosser
[Although framed as a report, this in many ways is a reader, a collection, that could be useful in multiple classes as well as interesting to researchers focused on these areas.] [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 12:54 pm by Jeff DeFrancisco
When he ultimately went to a specialist a year and a half later, he was diagnosed with Stage IV prostate cancer. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:46 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
Other highlights in this issue are the articles and case reviews concerning one of the most important constitutional law cases out of Germany in recent years, concerning the so-called Hartz IV payments to social welfare recipients. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:01 am
Bond Schoeneck & KingAn interesting case from the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky addresses a particularly difficult religious accommodation question: at what point can an employer prohibit an employee from expressing religious views in the workplace? [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 6:22 am by David Adelstein
(iv) What happens if a claim is denied and/or the initial decision maker/board denies the claim? [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 2:29 pm by NL
Comment It will be interesting to see how this goes. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 1:05 am by Poloko Hiri - competition winner
(iv) The granting of planning permission does not mean the activity in question is not a nuisance. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 9:21 am
Part IV explores the civil rights issues represented in the friendly alien-visitor narrative of the 1960s television show My Favorite Martian. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 12:50 pm by Ezra Rosser
Finally, Part IV of the paper links this exploration of structural inequality, exclusion, and public goods to broader debates in public law scholarship. [read post]