Search for: "Lord v. State" Results 2821 - 2840 of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2023, 1:28 am by Frank Cranmer
The court held that the display violated the separation of church and state and gave the municipality six months to remove it. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 12:21 am
Kamins was the lead plaintiff in the case, Connection Distributing Co., et al. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 7:29 pm
Kamins was the lead plaintiff in the case, Connection Distributing Co., et al. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm by Chuck Cosson
  This means a perfect state of security would lead to worse security than would a state where cybersecurity periodically fails. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 9:00 am by Jack Sharman
  Grand jury subpoenas, unlike trial subpoenas, may be served nationwide:  there are geographical limitations within the United States. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 7:48 am by emagraken
Caslavsky, 45 B.C.A.C. 62, and stated the following: A more recent case from this Court along similar lines is Brucks et al. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 5:33 am by The Charge
 - United States Constitution, Amendment 4 There is great consensus that the 1765 case of Entick v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 2:51 am by INFORRM
Media and Freedom of Expression Law in Other Jurisdictions The Tasmanian case of Burch v Parkinson ([2010] TASSC 42) concerned third party indemnity proceedings against the State of Tasmania. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 3:24 pm by Eilionoir Flynn
However, the Court of Appeal dismissed RP’s claims and refused leave of appeal to the House of Lords. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm by Merpel McKitten
It’s not for nothing that Lord Acton’s comment in his 1887 letter to Bishop Creighton was ‘Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely’. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 9:47 pm by Simon Gibbs
Lord Justice May stated: “When Costings Limited conducted the costs assessment hearing, their rights of audience rested on a fiction that they were employed by the solicitors and derived from section 27(2)(e) of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Resolved – IPSO mediation 08369-19 Miller v The Sunday Times, No breach – after investigation Resolution statement 07779-19 Wallace v Echo (Basildon), Resolved – IPSO mediation 07037-19 Foley v Mail Online, No breach – after investigation 06303-19 Hoy v Wisbech Standard, No breach – after investigation 06056-19 Baker v The Daily Telegraph, Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 05072-19 Smith v… [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:55 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
As the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Judge, said in his speech: [I]n our country, which is governed by the rule of law, upheld by an independent judiciary, the confidentiality principle is … subject to the clear limitation that the government and the intelligence services can never provide the country which provides intelligence with an unconditional guarantee that the confidentiality principle will never be set aside if the courts conclude that the interests of justice make it… [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am by INFORRM
On Thursday 12 May 2011, the Administrative Court will hear the renewed application for permission to apply for judicial review by Lord Prescott, Chris Bryant MP and others (Queen (on the application of Bryant and ors) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis). [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
According to Lord Sumption, in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd & Anor [2019] UKSC 27, the Act sought ‘to modify some of the common law rules which were seen unduly to favour the protection of reputation at the expense of freedom of expression’. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:30 am by Merpel
  As the Guidelines and the Protocol state, public access to virtual hearings remains ever important. [read post]