Search for: "MATTER OF J C B" Results 2821 - 2840 of 3,065
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
: (Chinese Law Prof Blog), China – The intellectual property rights crisis: (Ezine @rticles)   Europe European Court of Justice to consider trade mark questions in Case C-342/08 Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel e.a. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm by dirklasater
While most of our work at QuestionCopyright.org addresses artists and audiences, we're also always on the lookout for good pieces intended for the legal and policy research communities. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am by INFORRM
(a) in the United Kingdom; (b) in another Member State; or (c) in a state which is for the time being a contracting party to the Lugano Convention. (2) A court does not have jurisdiction to hear and determine an action to which this section applies unless the court is satisfied that, of all the places in which the statement complained of has been published, England and Wales is clearly the most appropriate place in which to bring an action in respect of the statement…. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm by Marty Lederman
  See also Hamdi, 542 U.S. at 549-551 (Souter, J., joined by Ginsburg, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part and concurring in the judgment) (government could not rely upon the AUMF to supersede an earlier statute limiting detention where the government was not acting in accord with the laws of war). [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am by Schachtman
With the exception of a few evidence scholars, Federal Rule of Evidence 703 is ignored or misunderstood in practice. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 7:00 am by Beyond Intractability
Many Gambians did not conceptualize conflict as a matter of incompatible goals or specific issues existing between two or discrete individuals. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
If I say “X should be allowed to say Y,” some might conclude that (a) I agree with X about Y, (b) I am causing harm to people who object to the saying of Y, or (c) I am an accomplice in the larger project in which X is engaged and of which saying Y is just one part.My view is that people should strive to speak the truth and be willing to listen to others speak the truth, even when it is unpleasant or even painful to hear. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Whether the lawyers should have gone public with their concerns, blowing the whistle on their client, remains a matter of debate. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am by Jack Goldsmith
A few states, for instance—including New York, where Fox is headquartered—require a showing of "actual malice" for all statements of public concern, including statements about private figures.[2] Most other states allow recovery of proven compensatory damages for libel based on a showing of mere negligence.[3] Presumably Fox would want to avoid even negligent mistakes, just as a matter of editorial policy. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
    Jonathan Joseph is a member of the California State Bar and has focused for over 33 years on regulatory, corporate, securities and transactional matters for banks and bank holding companies and officers and directors of distressed and failed institutions. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Given the dynamic pricing of most online advertising, with rates calculated on the basis of the demographics of the chosen advertising universe (such as age, sex, geography, interest, and purchasing patterns), passing along the costs of the tax to the advertisers themselves would be trivial for most advertising platforms, even if lawmakers also passed proposed legislation prohibiting platforms from adding a Maryland “surcharge” to advertising invoices, as has been proposed.[4] All these… [read post]