Search for: "Matter of G. C. ," Results 2821 - 2840 of 4,013
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2007, 9:39 am
It would not matter if it worked well enough for industry's needs, no matter how untidy it might look to civil servants and politicians.But there is no point in changing unless we can produce something better.Why cross border injunctions will not doAs is well-known the Dutch courts started this practice of enforcing patents granted in other countries. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Jim Dempsey
The privacy bill awaiting consideration in the U.S. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 7:35 pm
To overcome an anticipation rejection, the patentees argued that '[c]ulturing cells in three-dimensions results in the production of a conditioned medium having a different chemical composition than that of cells cultured by conventional means.' [...] [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 4:52 am
There are a number of points of divergence, some of which include:Art 25(a) and (c) UPCA do not explicitly have a territoriality requirement for infringement of a product patent, but s. 60(1)(a) and (c) PA 1977 do“Subject matter” protected under the UPCA is not necessarily the same as “the invention” protected by s. 60. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:04 am
  The final version of the work will appear in Julien Chaisse, Jędrzej Górski and Dini Sejko (eds) The Regulation of State-controlled enterprises: An Interdisciplinary and Comparative Examination’ (Springer forthcoming 2021). [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 6:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  If, having done so, the copyright owner forms a subjective good faith belief that there’s no fair use, it doesn’t matter how wrong it is. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
As with all matters of judicial interpretation, there are matters of nuance and construction. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 4:48 pm by Eugene Volokh
"Upon approval by above-mentioned parties, the club is considered a registered organization of F[ordham] C[ollege] L[incoln] C[enter] and G[abelli] S[chool of] B[usiness]. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 4:14 am
  g)    Specific scope and terms of non-disparagement agreements or non-competition agreements. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 8:12 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
See Heintzman and Goldsmith on Canadian Building Contracts, 4th ed., chapter 6, parts 2(b)(i)(C) and (ii)(C). [read post]