Search for: "People v. Case"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 52,294
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2012, 2:07 pm
In People v. [read post]
Michigan Supreme Court Reaffirms Right to Physically (But Nonlethally) Resist Illegal Police Conduct
23 Apr 2012, 9:45 am
(Eugene Volokh) The case is People v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 5:35 pm
However, the court remanded the case to the N-MCCA for analysis under United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 6:41 am
However, if we were in doubt, we can be cured and entertained by the fascinating case of Pingatore v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:37 am
People v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 8:33 am
The briefs were filed in support of a petition of certiorari pending before the Court, Kevin Keith v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 8:08 am
As the Fourth Circuit itself noted in yesterday's case of United States v Powell, Earlier this year, in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 11:51 am
(In another recent hyperlinking case, GS Media v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 10:39 am
Is there online chatter from possibly knowledgeable people about the underlying incident? [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 11:47 am
In Morgan v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:43 am
Our second case is Waleski v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:26 pm
” Then, discussing the venerable case of Diamond v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:21 pm
These are smart people on the Court, surely they could find a reason to return these political cases back to the elected branches and say, "you guys have to figure this out. [read post]
15 Jan 2025, 6:51 pm
Howard Case Summary:In People v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:45 am
From the case Commil v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 10:06 am
In State Farm v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 10:06 am
In State Farm v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 2:52 pm
In October I wrote about the risks of moving, pursuant to People v Crawford (71 AD2d 38) and Anders v California (386 US 738), to be relieved as assigned appellate attorney on the ground that the case presents no non-frivolous issues. [read post]
3 May 2021, 10:19 am
Yet even with a track record for filing a high volume of decisions, some of the court’s justices allow cases to languish for as long as seven years — an extraordinary failure that causes untold harm to the people trapped in the backlog.Under national standards created by judges, court administrators, clerks and attorneys, 95% of appellate cases should be resolved within one year. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 4:32 pm
In Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. [read post]
