Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I" Results 2821 - 2840 of 4,097
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2022, 7:20 am by Jon L. Gelman
The Department appealed as to the eleven workers, and the Court granted certification. 248 N.J. 400 (2021). [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 6:50 pm
The Court of Appeals unanimously held, contrary to the finding of the Appellate Division, that the language of the will did not show such a clear intention. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 6:23 am by Brett Holubeck
One side note, I am not going to repeat my 2019 labor and employment law predictions that are likely to happen in 2020 (new states that protect medical marijuana use outside of work, increased sexual harassment charges, the elimination of the H-4 EAD program, the NLRB issuing the joint employer standard, more states passing paid family leave, independent contractor issues arising, notices of inspection (I-9 inspections) increasing, and the Supreme… [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:48 am by Peter Mahler
On appeal by plaintiff, the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, reversed that part of the lower court’s order and granted summary judgment of liability in plaintiff’s favor. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 9:29 am by Jennifer Weil
While I don’t like that outcome, I can’t blame the judge for being a bit confused about how these cases should be decided, considering the state of the past case law reviewed in this opinion (the match-head case in particular). [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:03 am by Unknown
Title I of Division AA of the FY23 appropriations bill contains provisions for the registration of index-linked annuities. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
In the courts of appeals… In State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 2:42 pm
District Court for the Central District of California, urging dismissal of Smelt v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 12:22 pm by Schachtman
He was an expert witness for plaintiff in an Oklahoma state court case, Helton v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 10:34 pm
This was not taken into account by the Division Bench at all; the Court makes a bland reference [“see Adams v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:53 am by Dave
I am content that the views of the majority should prevail and that the appeal should be allowed”: [60]). [read post]
2 Sep 2017, 1:41 pm
The record on appeal and trial transcript are devoid of such information. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 3:22 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
’” LNYC Loft, LLC v Hudson Opportunity Fund I, LLC, 154 AD3d 109 [1st Dept 2017]. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court.[6] One influential re-articulation came in Wisconsin v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm by John Elwood
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc., 14-144, and Berger v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 4:23 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Dismissal Decision and Appeal In a short Decision and Order, Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Barry R. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 4:54 pm
A court, in interpreting a statute, should attempt to effectuate the attempt of the Legislature and is not free to legislate. in Pajak v Pajak, wherein the Court of Appeals held that the right to a divorce is statutorily created and since section 170 of the Domestic Relations Law did not provide for a defense to an action for divorce except upon the grounds of adultery, no defense could be offered to prevent plaintiff's claims of a right to a divorce on the… [read post]