Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 16,386
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2023, 7:54 am
Trump v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:32 am
Most recently, in McDonald v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 8:03 am
Souter dissenting in Rita v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
If there is a strong historical tradition of this type of [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 3:49 am
§ 671(a) and relied upon by Plaintiffs, is strong evidence that Congress did not intend these other various State plan elements in 42 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:37 pm
The Judge also held that while each US state is technically a separate jurisdiction, it would ‘defy common sense to hold that the State of California would not accept jurisdiction for all publications in the US’. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 5:30 pm
In Wisdom v. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 5:16 am
The court noted that a committee report could not serve as an independent statutory source having the force of law, citing United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 1:31 pm
v=ZIxg7LmlEQgquot;Who are the al Qaeda Seven? [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:34 pm
Ultimately the case turned on whether the interference was proportionate, and the Secretary’s decision had failed the requirements of the proportionality principle as summarised in Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 AC 167. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 9:25 am
The case is State v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 8:36 am
Somoza v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 5:40 am
In my Penn State employment law class, we cover the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision in Weaver v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 2:00 pm
’State v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 7:23 am
State v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
DOMA and United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:45 am
Bruesewitz also reveals Justice Sotomayor to be a strong advocate for state tort litigation who can be expected to narrowly construe even express preemption provisions to allow state law claims. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:32 am
The thrust of the court’s reasoning in that case was that, where an applicant’s failure to meet the requirements of being “a self-sufficient person” was very slight, his links with the host member state were particularly strong, and his claim was particularly meritorious, it would be disproportionate to reject his claim to enjoy the right of residence in that host state. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm
Raed Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department IA/21/21631/2011 – read judgment 1 Crown Office Row’s Neil Sheldon appeared for the Secretary of State in this case. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
In United States v. [read post]
