Search for: "US v. Green" Results 2821 - 2840 of 6,077
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2015, 8:09 am
 * Big, green and understated: the new Modern Law of PatentsJeremy presents the third edition of The Modern Law of Patents, which  Katfriends Ashley Roughton, Phillip Johnson, and Trevor Cook have manufactured with love and just published with LexisNexis. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Rule of LawZeligs v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
The US Supreme Court rejected such an argument in Arkansas Educational Television Commission v Forbes (1998). [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 2:32 pm
 You suspect that when a guy crossing the border hands ICE a green card --a green card with the guy's true name on it, his A-number, and all of his relevant information, not only is the government "[]able" to use that information to discover that the guy's been previously deported, but it's actually incredibly easy. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
  Unfortunately for them, Arnold J found that the research did not separate the results into the relevant class, that the sector was dominated by a small number of vehicle rental companies and that, until Europcar adopted the e-moving logo, Enterprise was the only company in the sector which used a lower case 'e' logo on a green background.The SurveysArnold J then introduced the surveys. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:45 am
However: (1) the social benefit in having a truthful depiction of King's actual words would be much greater than the copyright owners' loss, and (2) it is not required that all four fair use factors weigh in favour of a finding of fair use, as recent judgments, eg Cariou v Prince [here] or Seltzer v Green Day [here], demonstrate. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
As discussed here, in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 4:17 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  While the filing of an NOD triggers a 30-day period “for all CEQA challenges to the decision announced in the notice” (quoting Committee For Green Foothills v. [read post]