Search for: "United States v. Holder"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 4,280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
Crespin-Valladares v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 9:04 am
This infamous moment in the United States’ “global war on terror” will forever remain an ugly scar on our nation’s legacy as a people that (allegedly) value human rights and protect human dignity. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:05 am
Integra and Burnham sued Merck, Cheresh, and Scripps for patent infringement.307 Writing for a unanimous Court in Merck KGaA v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 10:07 pm
Judge Block cited some "general warrant" cases, like United States v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 10:54 am
The latest statistics from the United States Patent and Trademark Office on ex parte re-examination show that 92% of requests for reexaminations are granted. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:37 am
The Court is considering if the trademark holder is protected by the Lanham Act or if the toys’ producer instead receives heightened First Amendment protection due to the humorous nature of the dog toys, among other factors.Merrill v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 7:08 pm
In M.B.Z. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:54 am
In the wake of the CJEU's decision in Public Relations Consultants Association Ltd v Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd and Others (case C‑360/13) which held that browsing and viewing articles online does not require authorisation from the copyright holder, The PRCA has rejected an offer of a meeting with the Copyright Licensing Agency because it says it falls short of the terms it called for. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
In the United States that might mean the enterprise embedded within society; in Japan, it might suggest an enterprise embedded in itself and then society—that is, of corporations as autonomous and independent entities capable of self-ownership.[11] As a societal actor, the autonomy of the enterprise is privileged over the property rights of its equity holders. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 7:13 am
And in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 7:05 am
And in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 2:21 pm
We’ve just read Lyman v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 12:07 pm
In yesterday's post on Google's opening brief in the appeal of Judge Posner's Apple v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 12:55 pm
As one might expect with tax statutes, there are lots of defined terms so when we say “American” we really mean a “specified United States person”. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
§ 1182(a)(6)(C).3See, e.g., Dakura v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am
” The Court also heard oral arguments yesterday in United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 6:10 am
Let’s look at the facts of United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 12:40 pm
Last summer both Apple and Google's Motorola appealed Judge Posner's June 2012 dismissal of a two-way Apple v. [read post]
