Search for: "Application of Stevens" Results 2841 - 2860 of 4,212
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2011, 9:50 am by Mark Herrmann
Please don’t tell me over and over that the rule ‘is applicable’ here. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 5:21 pm by emp
The Privacy Commissioner found PIPEDA had been violated with the release of the Stevens’ account information to his employer (it was, after all, a personal account) and Stevens then filed a s. 14 application seeking s. 16 damages in the amount of $148,000. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:34 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Jan. 6, 2011, Stevens, Donohue, and Ott, JJ.).The Superior Court applied Pa.R.C.P. 2229(b), pertaining to the joinder of actions, and found that the requirements of that rule were not met to allow for a joinder of a tort claim with a declaratory judgment action on a coverage question. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:34 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Jan. 6, 2011, Stevens, Donohue, and Ott, JJ.).The Superior Court applied Pa.R.C.P. 2229(b), pertaining to the joinder of actions, and found that the requirements of that rule were not met to allow for a joinder of a tort claim with a declaratory judgment action on a coverage question. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:11 am by Falk Metzler
Instead, the parties will negotiate a cross-license to all of the patents, and patent applications, owned by each party. [read post]
The court’s rules leave room for an individual to request that the rule be lifted, but that person must prove “that exceptional circumstances exist in which application of a rule would create an injustice or undue hardship. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 1:47 pm by INFORRM
  It suggests that “the Court’s decisions to review Stevens, Snyder, and Entertainment Merchants in such a short time frame are certainly noteworthy. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 3:40 pm by Hank Fasthoff
  Second, assuming application of US law, could the list be considered “original” such that it would be protectable under copyright law? [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 10:45 am by Mirriam Seddiq
  Right now we are working on some TRO's in the Eastern District of Virginia, followed by Padilla motions, followed by applications for relief. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 11:24 am by admin
“Not to take responsibility from what he did, but Harvard has to own up to what it did by letting him in,’’ said Steven Sussman, Wheeler’s attorney. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 3:30 am by Gene Quinn
The ensuing ruling, if it sides with Microsoft, would stall patent prosecution and thousands and thousands of documents would be submitted to patent examiners with applicants demanding they be considered. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 3:21 am by Larry Ribstein
The brief says the lower standard of scrutiny applicable to commercial speech (Cent. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
   Matter of Stevens (Allied Builders, Inc.), 74 AD3d 1757, 2010 NY Slip Op 05066 (4th Dept June 11, 2010), where the court construed a shareholder's agreement as not triggering a mandatory buyout upon the minority shareholder's filing of a dissolution petitioner. [read post]