Search for: "Does 1 - 29"
Results 2841 - 2860
of 13,847
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2021, 7:19 am
Court held that Kentucky’s codification of the ICPC, contained in KRS 615.030, does not require a home study for a noncustodial parent who is not the subject of allegations or findings of abuse or neglect. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:37 am
” Professors’ Amicus Br. at 1. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:19 am
What does the historic election of President Joseph R. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
First, the New York Convention does not prescribe any strict definition of “arbitral award”, instead granting interpretative discretion to the jurisdiction in which enforcement is sought.[12]Medvedskaya, supra note 5, at 84. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm
A hearing had been listed for 29 March 2021. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 2:14 am
Nat Med (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01283-zRelated ArticlesOSHA: Executive Order on Protecting Worker Health and Safety 1/23/21National Strategy for The COVID-19 Response and Pandemic Preparedness 1/22/21More than half of COVID-19 health care workers at risk for mental health problems 1/20/21Disability for Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 1/1/21OSHA Temporary Emergency COVID Standard on the Horizon 12/29/20Vaccine… [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 3:36 pm
The law requires employers of all sizes to provide 1 hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours worked or another approved method. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 2:37 pm
See, e.g., Appellant’s Br. 21–22, 29–34, 43, 46. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 10:51 am
In an effort to avoid the prohibitive cost of hard copies, the book will be made available first as an EPub (iBook, Kindle, Amazon) (ISBN: 978-1-949943-03-0 (ebk). [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 2:00 am
Johnson’s September premium payment was due September 1, 2018. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 7:50 am
Table 1. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 3:30 am
Marlene Gebauer 1:44 That’s true. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 12:05 pm
SB 95 Is Retroactive to January 1, 2021 The COVID-19 supplemental paid sick leave requirements set forth in SB 95 apply retroactively to January 1, 2021. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 11:52 pm
If, at any time from January 1 through March 28, 2021, an employee was unable to work for any of the qualifying reasons for the new COVID-19 supplemental PSL and was not paid in that period, the employer must, on the employee’s request, pay the supplemental PSL the employee would have been paid had the leave been taken on or after March 29, 2021. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 5:35 pm
Therefore, the wider dissemination of that information does not fall within the scope of this decision (§16). [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 4:54 pm
This new requirement goes into effect on March 29, 2021 (although, as discussed below, leave provided on or after January 1, 2021 may be applied retroactively) and expires on September 30, 2021, unless otherwise extended. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 3:03 pm
But three does not make four. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 1:02 pm
A request made before March 29 does not count. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 10:42 am
How does that relate to Canadian law? [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 10:42 am
How does that relate to Canadian law? [read post]
