Search for: "FRAME v FRAME" Results 2841 - 2860 of 8,298
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2019, 5:36 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Addressing a motion for summary judgment on behalf of NYPD and certain of its named staff members [City Defendants], the Appellate Division said that an action brought under the NYCHRL must be analyzed under both the framework of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, 411 US 792, and under the newer mixed motive framework, which imposes a lesser burden on a plaintiff opposing such a motion," citing Persaud v Walgreens Co., 161 AD3d 1019. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 12:45 pm by The Public Employment Law Press
Negotiating disciplinary procedures for City of Schenectady police officers held a prohibited subject of collective bargainingCity of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 6:47 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
Everyone agrees that Congress can put a ratification deadline into the text of an amendment (Dillon v. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 11:40 am by Larry
The case is Eteros Technologies USA, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 6:30 am
But of the various cases I have read on the subject of dueling, the language in Smith v. [read post]
14 Dec 2024, 3:45 pm by Howard Knopf
So sayeth the Supreme Court of Canada in the landmark decision Euro-Excellence Inc. v. [read post]