Search for: "Gay v. State" Results 2841 - 2860 of 3,739
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2009, 5:16 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Ottawa Citizen and the 2006 House of Lord's decision, Jameel v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:20 am by James Romoser
John Lewis and writes that Lewis’ lifelong fight to protect voting rights continues in light of the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
He served as Missouri state director for Sen. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:30 am by SHG
We firmly believe that states cannot compel artists or anyone else to express messages with which they disagree. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:24 am
Schweitzer, No. 06-35384 Dismissal of a state takings claims arising out of a state ban on open-pit mining for gold or silver by the cyanide heap leaching process is affirmed where the Eleventh Amendment bars a reverse condemnation action brought in federal court against state officers in their official capacities. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:02 pm
The New York Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, recently issued an opinion in the case captioned, People v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 8:23 am by admin
Zarda to determine discrimination against openly gay workers is prohibited under Title VII. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 6:19 pm by Garry J. Wise, Wise Law Office, Toronto
For example, in his ruling today, Judge Walker casts serious doubt on whether the proponents of Prop 8 even have "standing" to pursue an appeal because they do not speak for the state of California, and the official representatives of the state agree that Prop 8 is unconstitutional. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:40 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Whatcott violated section 14(1)(b) of the Saskatchewan Human Rights Code when he circulated flyers using extreme speech directed against gay men. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:30 am by azatty
In April 2009, the Iowa Supreme Court, in Varnum v. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 4:45 am by Charles Sartain
Sentence: Awaiting, after an eight day trial. __________ Perp: Susan Gay Pruitt Offense: State securities fraud. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:09 am by Timothy P. Flynn
  The appellate judge suggested that perhaps the issue could be posed to the California Supreme Court for a determination as to whether California law would allow any entity to stand in as a legal “proxy” for the suit.Perry’s well-heeled lawyers stated in response to the suggestion that even if California law allowed a proxy-style legal fight, the proxy would be unable to demonstrate how they were harmed by lifting the ban against same-sex marriage.Scholars of the… [read post]