Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: T. S." Results 2841 - 2860 of 182,369
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2024, 12:08 pm by Dennis Crouch
May 1, 2024) offers some interesting insight into leveraged patent transactions, and the effect of a lender’s ability to license or assign a patent on the patent owner’s standing to sue for infringement, especially after default. [read post]
1 May 2024, 12:05 pm by Ashley Belanger
With the subject line "Thoughts on OpenAI," the email came from Microsoft's chief technology officer, Kevin Scott, who is also the company’s executive vice president of AI. [read post]
We don’t know exactly when that’s gonna occur, but it should be sometime very soon. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:32 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Foodies will be interested to see what Disneyland chefs add to the menu when six Pixar Fest festival marketplace booths open May 10 at Disney California Adventure. [read post]
1 May 2024, 7:14 am by Steven Schwartzapfel
Now, as an aside, it’s perfectly okay if you don’t have an answer for every question. [read post]
1 May 2024, 7:00 am by Mike Habib, EA
Incorrect information can lead to penalties, interest charges, and even audits. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:48 am by jonathanturley
No, the threat is that justices may want to balance the interests over immunity by rejecting the extreme arguments on both sides. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:17 am by Beatrice Yahia
Sunak “continued to push for an immediate humanitarian pause to allow more aid in and hostages out” and “reiterated the UK’s support for Israel’s security,” saying “our focus is on de-escalation which is essential and in everyone’s interest. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" Indeed, it is the kind of case that "further the public's interest in enforcing legal and social norms. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:43 am by admin
Our trial attorneys are experienced litigators who will fight relentlessly for your interests in court. 6. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:12 am
Araujo maintained that Framboise’s priority date was not supported by substantial evidence "because the Board relied on the testimony of a single interested witness, Extrakt, and that his declaration was merely naked general assertions of prior use. [read post]
1 May 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
 The truth is that he didn't, the brief didn't, and, unlike the merits of affirmative action, there are not two sides to that debate. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:31 am by Alessandro Cerri
However the most interesting for trade mark practitioners are the Court's findings in respect of the reputation of an earlier trade mark, and the evidence required to prove such a reputation. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:00 am by Yosi Yahoudai
Right now, all Aggarwal can do in such situations is offer his patients “harm reduction strategies,” he said, “but I don’t think that’s good enough. [read post]