Search for: "In v. United States" Results 2841 - 2860 of 102,787
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2024, 7:16 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Patent Office issued the following xxx patents to persons and businesses in Indiana in November 2023: PATENT NUMBER PATENT TITLE US 11826689 B2 Air filter arrangement; assembly; and, methods US 11830717 B2 Ion focusing US 11826832 B2 Passivation and alloying element retention in gas atomized powders US 11830716 B2 Mass spectrometry analysis of microorganisms in samples US 11828908 B2 Rack-mountable equipment with a high-heat-dissipation module, and transceiver receptacle with increased cooling US… [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Chile Eboe-Osuji
Germany, the U.K., and the United States notably belong to the latter camp. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 1:00 am
District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina -- is captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 7:27 pm by Solomon L. Wisenberg
United States, one of three cases in which the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:29 am
Fair enough.But the United States decided to go further. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 10:59 am by Kalvis Golde
United States, the states ask the justices to grant review and reverse the 6th Circuit’s ruling. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:38 am by Beatrice Yahia
”  The Houthis’ military spokesperson Yahya Sarea has issued a statement saying the United States and the United Kingdom carried out 18 strikes in Yemen in total, warning “these attacks will not go unanswered. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 1:50 am by CMS
The Supreme Court considered a number of decisions by the ECtHR, including Unite the Union v United Kingdom [2017] IRLR 438, in which it was held that member states have a wide margin of discretion in how they protect trade union freedom. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 11:30 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
The December 19, 2023 order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, case No. 23-50869, is vacated. [read post]