Search for: "People v. Polite" Results 2841 - 2860 of 13,776
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2021, 6:00 am by CMS
“I ended up doing a year of graduate study in Philosophy at Harvard after I finished university in this country, which I spent studying Political and Legal Philosophy, which was kind of a route into law. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
As Sandy Levinson notes in his blog post, who “we” are as a people has a great deal to do with ancestry. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:28 am by Michael C. Dorf
That is, let's suppose that in NYS Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 6:48 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Hislop at para 53, and R. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 7:29 am by Richard Hunt
To this the Court replied: The refusal to serve food to pedestrians at drive-through windows does not impact blind people differently or in a greater manner than the significant population of non-disabled people who lack access to motor vehicles. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 12:35 pm by Leila Rafei
In a political science class, we discussed President Andrew Jackson’s role in the Trail of Tears, a mass atrocity committed against Indigenous people, without acknowledging the horrors they faced and continue to experience today. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 7:31 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Then, as today, American Indian tribes persisted as self-governing peoples with ongoing and important political relationships with the United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 9:25 am by admin
” In other words, treating people equally is racist. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 5:14 am by Jack Goldsmith, Bob Bauer
But the Supreme Court’s invalidation of the legislative veto in INS v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 Nackenoff and Novkov remind us that political violence occurred, but they don’t dwell on it. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm by Natasha Brunstein
American Telephone & Telegraph in 1994 and FDA v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
Meta (formally Facebook) has announced it will “no longer allow advertisers to select terms for ad targeting related to sensitive identifying traits, such as race, ethnicity, political affiliation, religion, or sexual orientation. [read post]