Search for: "SECTION 13 OFFICER"
Results 2841 - 2860
of 7,760
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2018, 2:26 pm
The HHS, Office of Inspector General (OIG) assumed responsibility for taking these administrative actions in 1981.[4] What is an exclusion? [read post]
20 May 2018, 2:26 pm
The HHS, Office of Inspector General (OIG) assumed responsibility for taking these administrative actions in 1981.[4] What is an exclusion? [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:54 am
Opinion at *13. [read post]
18 May 2018, 8:02 am
” To drive that last point home, a broad cross-section of amici argue that the 10th Circuit’s decision “will upend Oklahoma’s energy regulation” and cause “significant jurisdictional consequences. [read post]
18 May 2018, 3:56 am
Apr. 13, 2016).[7] FRAND breaches could satisfy the section 2 elements of exclusionary conduct by demonstrating an exclusion of competitors (the exclusion of rival competitive technologies not chosen by the SSO) that results in competitive injury (price increases and innovation harms from the breach) and acquisition or maintenance of monopoly power (obtained through the breach). [read post]
16 May 2018, 1:16 pm
See Section 109 of the U.S. [read post]
15 May 2018, 1:31 pm
If a hearing is requested in accordance with section 2483, in addition to specific issues required by a specific offense, the scope of the hearing must include whether: A. [read post]
15 May 2018, 12:32 pm
However, under A.R.S. section 13-3925, the evidence will not be suppressed if the prosecution can establish that the officer’s actions were based on a “reasonable, good faith belief that the conduct was proper. [read post]
15 May 2018, 12:32 pm
However, under A.R.S. section 13-3925, the evidence will not be suppressed if the prosecution can establish that the officer’s actions were based on a “reasonable, good faith belief that the conduct was proper. [read post]
14 May 2018, 11:19 am
” Although it did not involve the new DPC section, AG Grewal’s office already has been active in data privacy matters, most recently settling with Chinese app developer Meitu Inc. and its U.S. subsidiary Xiamen Meitu Technology Co. [read post]
14 May 2018, 5:15 am
The Federal Circuit recently affirmed a decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office to reject VerHoef's pending application 13/328,201 for a dog harness under pre-AIA Section 102(f) because the applicant “did not himself invent the subject matter sought to be patented. [read post]
14 May 2018, 5:15 am
The Federal Circuit recently affirmed a decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office to reject VerHoef's pending application 13/328,201 for a dog harness under pre-AIA Section 102(f) because the applicant “did not himself invent the subject matter sought to be patented. [read post]
13 May 2018, 4:09 pm
We had case reports on Day 12 and Day 13 of this trial. [read post]
13 May 2018, 12:22 pm
” Id. at *13.Of Note: Another issue in this long opinion is the role of capital counsel under 18 USC Section 3005. [read post]
13 May 2018, 12:15 pm
In 2001, Collective signed a Section 8(f) agreement with the Laborers Union. [read post]
13 May 2018, 12:15 pm
In 2001, Collective signed a Section 8(f) agreement with the Laborers Union. [read post]
13 May 2018, 9:29 am
(On a vaguely related note, Eric has flagged how the copyright office DMCA renewal requirement could unnecessarily penalize less sophisticated website.) [read post]
13 May 2018, 2:45 am
On May 13, 1846, the United States Congress declared war on Mexico after a request from President James K. [read post]
12 May 2018, 3:25 pm
However, as explainedabove, see supra Section II.B–C, the PTAB abused itsdiscretion by refusing to consider Mr. [read post]
10 May 2018, 5:01 am
Magar is a section officer at the High Court Tulsipur, Butwal BenchClick headlines to visit the site. [read post]