Search for: "State v. Governor" Results 2841 - 2860 of 7,131
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2017, 4:45 am by NCC Staff
NCAA Then on Tuesday, one of the biggest cases of the current term gets the Court’s undisputed attention: Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the justices heard oral argument in Carpenter v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 10:16 am by Amy Howe
[Editor’s note: An earlier version of this post ran on August 14, as an introduction to the blog’s symposium on Christie v. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
Supreme Court case, Christie v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 9:57 am by Lorelie S. Masters
However, as in civil procedure applicable in the United States, parties may move to compel disclosure if the opposing party refuses or fails to produce documents. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:12 am by Paul T. Moura and Lorelie S. Masters
  For example, the New York Court of Appeals rejected a literal application of the “total pollution exclusion” in Belt Painting v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:12 am by Paul T. Moura
  For example, the New York Court of Appeals rejected a literal application of the “total pollution exclusion” in Belt Painting v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am by Lorelie S. Masters
  For example, the New York Insurance Law specifically provides that evidence relating to other “similarly situated” policyholders is relevant to the issue of the materiality of an alleged misrepresentation in the policy application.5 As exemplified by the New York Court of Appeals in Belt Painting v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am by Lorelie S. Masters and Paul T. Moura
  For example, the New York Insurance Law specifically provides that evidence relating to other “similarly situated” policyholders is relevant to the issue of the materiality of an alleged misrepresentation in the policy application.5 As exemplified by the New York Court of Appeals in Belt Painting v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 8:55 am by jlucivero
With this sweeping new rule, New York has become the first state in the nation to require all of its criminal trial judges to issue so-called “Brady orders” in every case (named after the 1963 case of Brady v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 6:40 am by MBettman
” And yet, since the landmark decision in 2002 in Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:04 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
The court shall, however, revoke the nonresident's driving privilege to operate a motor vehicle in this State, in accordance with this section. [read post]