Search for: "State v. Lively"
Results 2841 - 2860
of 28,985
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2022, 3:30 pm
From yesterday's Ohio Supreme Court decision in State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 1:37 pm
The case that laid the foundation for PFAS litigation was Leach v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 12:30 pm
And also, a starkly different holding from the Tenth Circuit in the wake of Egbert v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 2:52 pm
Trump, California v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:32 pm
The opinion is likely to be short lived—and, as such, might normally not be worth significant comment. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 7:57 am
State v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
On the state level, formal constitutional change is persistent and ongoing. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:55 am
In Ileto v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am
Some state right of publicity laws would make that actionable; some would not, because they only apply to the living;[17] and some (including Fox's New York home) probably would not, because they apply to the dead but exclude "audiovisual works,"[18] a category that likely covers video games.[19] Yet again, the law of one state in which a famous player was domiciled when he died would have an effect on what Fox can sell from New York to all 50… [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
In Carson v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 11:13 am
See Knake Jefferson at 34 (citing State ex rel, Okla Bar Ass’n v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Today, small rural states with less diverse populations benefit from state equality in the Senate. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
This state "police power" to regulate "health, safety, and morals" is implicitly acknowledged by the Constitution's structure of enumerated powers, and by the Tenth Amendment.[1] The Constitution's preservation of the police power in the states ensures that "the facets of governing that touch on citizens' daily lives are normally administered by smaller governments closer to the governed. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:31 pm
” On that occasion, he also acknowledged that “there might be some of us that might lose our lives. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 9:50 am
Supreme Court case Brady v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
It's well known that in Bruen v. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Article V of the Constitution lays out two mechanisms for amendment. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm
On 1 August 2022, judgment was handed down in Wright v McCormack [2022] EWHC 2068 (QB) by Chamberlain J. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 11:35 am
” People v. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
While the former course is undoubtedly preferable, past events in the United States and beyond make it crystal clear that both are possible. [read post]
