Search for: "State v. Minor"
Results 2841 - 2860
of 16,399
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2021, 7:57 am
In Oracle v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:23 am
In addition costs could be sought through the service charge as a lease clause stating “5. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 3:48 am
One is New York’s common-law dissolution doctrine as ratified by the Court of Appeals’ 1963 ruling in Leibert v Clapp, authorizing courts to adjudicate a minority shareholder’s non-statutory cause of action for judicial dissolution where the majority shareholders “have so palpably breached the fiduciary duty they owe to the minority shareholders that they are disqualified from exercising the exclusive discretion and the dissolution power given to… [read post]
3 Apr 2021, 4:04 am
But in an odd California case, Karton v. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 6:00 am
Saada v. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 4:10 am
The United States Supreme Court yesterday released its decision upholding the FCC’s 2017 changes to its ownership rules in the FCC v Prometheus Radio Project case (see our summary here). [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 9:03 pm
” Walters highlighted that in Gundy v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 10:48 am
Assn. of United States, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 6:01 am
"] Obergefell v. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 5:00 am
., a minor, 2021 Pa. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 8:01 pm
See Terkel v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm
One New Jersey appellate court upheld the disqualification of an expert witness who had worked for the State of New Jersey on a case that involved confidential disclosures by the State’s lawyers and its agencies, which disclosures were necessarily involved in the expert witness’s subsequent retention by the State’s adversary in a different case.[10] This decision, like most in this area, turned on a close analysis of the facts and circumstances of the… [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:19 am
A.G. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:19 am
Serv., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 7:30 pm
In the 2011 securities decision, the Court stated, [61] While flexibility and cooperation are important to federalism, they cannot override or modify the separation of powers. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 9:01 am
–State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 5:14 am
Dickinson v. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 2:30 pm
While California, other states and now NASDAQ are pushing for diversity requirements, the execution of how eligible companies reach the requisite female and underrepresented minorities on boards within the next few years is not laid out as it is in the January 20 executive order. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 2:32 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 8:44 am
From Alkhairy v. [read post]
